Determination of the optimal reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenal resection based on modified scintigraphy of gastrointestinal motility
https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2023-3-48-55
Abstract
Aim. To improve the outcomes of pancreaticoduodenal resection by determining the optimal reconstruction based on objective assessment of the functional state of the upper gastrointestinal tract using a modified “double” scintigraphic study.
Materials and methods. 147 pancreaticoduodenal resections were performed in the period of 2016–2022. Patients underwent “double” scintigraphic study on days 30 and 90 after surgery. The mean age of the patients was 59.6 years (23–83); the male to female ratio was 1.27:1. All patients underwent gastropancreatoduodenal resection or pancreatoduodenal resection with pylorus preservation. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the variant of the reconstructive stage of surgery. Group 1 underwent reconstruction according to Child, group 2 – Child reconstruction and interintestinal anastomosis formation according to Brown, the reconstructive stage in group 3 involved Roux-en-Y isolation of the small intestine (Roux-en-Y reconstruction).
Results. “Double” scintigraphic study revealed that the best result on the 30th and 90th postoperative days was observed in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenal resection with pylorus preservation, reconstructive stage according to Child and formation of interintestinal anastomosis after Brown.
Conclusion. “Double” scintigraphy is an effective procedure to determine the motility of the stomach, biliodigestive anastomosis and motility of the small intestine. As a result, the optimal reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenal resection was determined in patients with neoplasms of the pancreatic head or the periampullary region and chronic pancreatitis.
About the Authors
A. V. ShabuninRussian Federation
Alexey V. Shabunin – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Surgery of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Chief Physician, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284; 2/1 bld. 1, Barrikadnaya str., Moscow, 125993
V. V. Bedin
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Bedin – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgery of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Professor of the Department of Surgery of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284; 2/1 bld. 1, Barrikadnaya str., Moscow, 125993
M. M. Tavobilov
Russian Federation
Mikhail M. Tavobilov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Liver and Pancreas Surgery of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, Professor of the Department of Surgery of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284; 2/1 bld. 1, Barrikadnaya str., Moscow, 125993
A. A. Karpov
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Karpov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Surgeon, Department of Liver and Pancreas Surgery of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284
A. V. Karalkin
Russian Federation
Anatoly V. Karalkin – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Pavlov Department of Radiotherapy and Radiology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Head of the Radioisotope Diagnostics Unit of the N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No.1.
8, Leninsky prospekt, Moscow, 119049
E. I. Vasilenko
Russian Federation
Elena I. Vasilenko – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Radionuclide Diagnostics Unit, University Clinic No. 1 of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.
8, bld. 2, Trubetskaya str., Moscow, 119991
K. A. Abramov
Russian Federation
Kirill A. Abramov – Junior Researcher, Surgeon, Department of Liver and Pancreas Surgery of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284
Phone: +7-499-740-58-70, +7-926-561-25-20
A. V. Lantsynova
Russian Federation
Aysa V. Lantsynova – Surgeon, Department of Liver and Pancreas Surgery of S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital.
5, 2nd Botkinsky pr., Moscow, 125284
References
1. Cameron J.L., He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015; 220 (4): 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031
2. Narayanan S., Martin A.N., Turrentine F.E., Bauer T.W., Adams R.B., Zaydfudim V.M. Mortality after pancreatico-duodenectomy: assessing early and late causes of patient death. J. Surg. Res. 2018; 231: 304–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.075
3. Welsch T., Borm M., Degrate L., Hinz U., Büchler M.W., Wente M.N. Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy in a high-volume centre. Br. J. Surg. 2010; 97 (7): 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7071
4. Francken M.F.G., van Roessel S., Swijnenburg R.J., Erdmann J.I., Busch O.R., Dijkgraaf M.G.W., Besselink M.G. Hospital costs of delayed gastric emptying following pancreatoduodenectomy and the financial headroom for novel prophylactic treatment strategies. HPB (Oxford). 2021; 23 (12): 1865–1872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.04.025
5. Wente M.N., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Fingerhut A., Gouma D.J., Izbicki J.R., Neoptolemos J.P., Padbury R.T., Sarr M.G., Traverso L.W., Yeo C.J., Büchler M.W. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142 (5): 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005
6. Revicki D.A., Rentz A.M., Dubois D., Kahrilas P., Stanghellini V., Talley N.J., Tack J. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of severity of gastroparesis symptoms. Qual. Life Res. 2004; 13 (4): 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021689.86296.e4
7. Wauters L., Dickman R., Drug V., Mulak A., Serra J., Enck P., Tack J., ESNM FD Consensus Group, Accarino A., Barbara G., Bor S., Coffin B., Corsetti M., De Schepper H., Dumitrascu D., Farmer A., Gourcerol G., Hauser G., Hausken T., Karamanolis G., Zerbib F. United European Gastroenterology (UEG) and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) consensus on functional dyspepsia. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2021; 33 (9): e14238. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14238
8. Vijayvargiya P., Jameie-Oskooei S., Camilleri M., Chedid V., Erwin P.J., Murad M.H. Association between delayed gastric emptying and upper gastrointestinal symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2019; 68 (5): 804–813. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316405
9. Kunz P., Crelier G.R., Schwizer W., Borovicka J., Kreiss C., Fried M., Boesiger P. Gastric emptying and motility: assessment with MR imaging – preliminary observations. Radiology. 1998; 207 (1): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530296
10. Stein E., Berger Z., Hutfless S., Shah L., Wilson L.M., Haberl E.B., Bass E.B. Clarke J.O. Wireless motility capsule versus other diagnostic technologies for evaluating gastroparesis and constipation: a comparative effectiveness review. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US). 2013 (Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, No. 110.) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK143974/
11. Abell T.L., Camilleri M., Donohoe K., Hasler W.L., Lin H.C., Maurer A.H., McCallum R.W., Nowak T., Nusynowitz M.L., Parkman H.P., Shreve P., Szarka L.A., Snape W.J. Jr, Ziessman H.A. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J. Nucl. Med. Technol. 2008; 36 (1): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.107.048116
12. Shabunin A.V., Tavobilov M.M., Karpov A.A. Functional condition of the stomach and the small bowel after pancreatic resection. Annals of Surgery (Russia). 2016; 21 (1–2): 134–138. (In Russian)
13. Hüttner F.J., Fitzmaurice C., Schwarzer G., Seiler C.M., Antes G., Büchler M.W., Diener M.K. Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (pp Whipple) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (classic Whipple) for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; 2 (2): CD006053. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006053.pub6
14. Karmazanovsky G.G., Guzeeva E.B., Buriev I.M., Shevchenko T.V. Radiological study of the stomach after pancreaticoduodenal resection. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 1998; 5: 26–30. (In Russian)
15. Ueno T., Takashima M., Iida M., Yoshida S., Suzuki N., Oka M. Improvement of early delayed gastric emptying in patients with Billroth I type of reconstruction after pylorus preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2009; 16 (3): 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0054-1
16. Murakami Y., Uemura K., Sudo T., Hayashidani Y., Hashimoto Y., Nakagawa N., Ohge H., Sueda T. An antecolic Roux-en Y type reconstruction decreased delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008; 12 (6): 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0483-1
Review
For citations:
Shabunin A.V., Bedin V.V., Tavobilov M.M., Karpov A.A., Karalkin A.V., Vasilenko E.I., Abramov K.A., Lantsynova A.V. Determination of the optimal reconstruction for pancreaticoduodenal resection based on modified scintigraphy of gastrointestinal motility. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2023;28(3):48-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2023-3-48-55