Features of laparoscopic liver resection training after mastering of robot-assisted technology

   Aim. To estimate the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resections performed by a surgeon experienced in robot-assisted liver resections using the CUSUM method.

   Materials and methods. The study involved a retrospective analysis of the results of laparoscopic liver resections for malignant and benign neoplasms performed from 2015 to December 2020 and robot-assisted liver resections from 2010 to 2020. The author evaluated the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resections of a surgeon who had mastered robot-assisted resections of high difficulty. Selecting the boundaries between training periods according to the obtained CUSUM graphs was determined by critical changes in the resection difficulty score (IWATE and IMM), duration of surgery, blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications. Major perioperative events were compared between the laparoscopic and robot-assisted resection groups in each of the training periods.

   Results. 174 laparoscopic and 57 robot-assisted liver resections were performed. The duration of the first training period comprised 11 robot-assisted resections and 20 laparoscopic resections, the second period – 16 and 20, the third period – 30 and 134, accordingly. In the second period, the resection difficulty score increased significantly for both groups, while the amount of blood loss, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the duration of hospital treatment did not differ significantly. In the second training period, the duration of surgery was significantly longer in both groups.

   Conclusion. Studying the dynamics of surgical difficulty using the CUSUM method is considered to be a reliable, controlled way to estimate the learning curve for liver resection. Completing the learning curve for robot-assisted liver resections reduces the duration of the learning curve for laparoscopic resections compared to published data of other authors.

1. Zhou Y., Xiao Y., Wu L., Li B., Li H. Laparoscopic liver resection as safe and effective alternative to open resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2013; 13: 44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-44

2. Xiong J.J., Altaf K., Javed M.A., Huang W., Mukherjee R., Mai G., Sutton R., Liu X.B., Hu W.M. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 18 (45): 6657–6668. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657

3. Vigano L., Laurent A., Tayar C., Tomatis M., Ponti A., Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection. Ann. Surg. 2009; 250 (5): 772–782. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bd93b2

4. Lin C.W., Tsai T.J., Cheng T.Y., Wei H.K., Hung C.F., Chen Y.Y., Chen C.M. The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: will it be more effective and smooth? Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (7): 2895–2903. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4575-1

5. Van der Poel M.J., Besselink M.G., Cipriani F., Armstrong T., Takhar A.S., van Dieren S., Primrose J.N., Pearce N.W., Abu Hilal M. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surgery. 2016; 151 (10): 923. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655

6. Son G.M., Kim J.G., Lee J.C., Suh Y.J., Cho H.M., Lee Y.S., Lee I.K., Chun C.S. Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2010; 20 (7): 609–617. doi: 10.1089/lap.2010.0007

7. Schlachta C.M., Mamazza J., Seshadri P.A., Cadeddu M., Gregoire R., Poulin E.C. Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis. Colon. Rectum. 2001; 44 (2): 217–222. doi: 10.1007/BF02234296

8. Kayano H., Okuda J., Tanaka K., Kondo K., Tanigawa N. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25 (9): 2972–2979. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1655-8

9. Akiyoshi T., Kuroyanagi H., Ueno M., Oya M., Fujimoto Y., Konishi T., Yamaguchi T. Learning curve for standardized laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer under supervision: a single-center experience. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25 (5): 1409–1414. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1404-4

10. Ito M., Sugito M., Kobayashi A., Nishizawa Y., Tsunoda Y., Saito N. Influence of learning curve on short-term results after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2009; 23 (2): 403–408. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9912-1

11. Wishner J.D., Baker Jr J.W., Hoffman G.C., Hubbard 2^nd G.W., Gould R.J., Wohlgemuth S.D., Ruffin W.K., Melick C.F. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve. Surg. Endosc. 1995; 9 (11): 1179–1183. doi: 10.1007/BF00210923

12. Ban D., Tanabe М., Ito Н., Otsuka Y., Nitta Н., Abe Y., Hasegawa Y., Katagiri Т., Takagi С., Itano О., Kaneko Н., Wakabayashi G. A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2014; 21 (10): 745–753. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166

13. Sucandy I., Kang R.D., Adorno J., Crespo K., Syblis C., Ross S., Rosemurgy A. Validity of the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris classification system for robotic liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2023; 25 (9): 1022–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.004

14. Efanov M.G., Alikhanov R.B., Tsvirkun V.V., Prostov M.Yu., Kazakov I.V., Vankovich A.N., Kim P.P., Grendal K.D. Early outcomes of robot-assisted liver resection. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery = Khirurgiya. Zurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018; 11: 24–30. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia201811124 (In Russian)

15. Hasegawa Y., Nitta H., Takahara T., Katagiri H., Baba S., Takeda D., Makabe K., Wakabayashi G., Sasaki A. Safely extending the indications of laparoscopic liver resection: when should we start laparoscopic major hepatectomy? Surg. Endosc. 2017; 31 (1): 309–316. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4973-z

16. Nguyen K.T., Gamblin T.C., Geller D.A. World review of laparoscopic liver resection – 2,804 patients. Ann. Surg. 2009; 250 (5): 831–841. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df

17. Koffron A.J., Auffenberg G., Kung R., Abecassis M. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann. Surg. 2007; 246 (3): 385–392. discussion 392–394. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318146996c

18. Bryant R., Laurent A., Tayar C., Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection – understanding its role in current practice: the Henri Mondor Hospital experience. Ann. Surg. 2009; 250 (1): 103–111. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ad6660

19. Cai X., Li Z., Zhang Y., Yu H., Liang X., Jin R., Luo F. Laparoscopic liver resection and the learning curve: a 14-year, single-center experience. Surg. Endosc. 2014; 28 (4): 1334–1341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3333-5

20. Sultana A., Nightingale P., Marudanayagam R., Sutcliffe R.P. Evaluating the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection: a comparative study between standard and learning curve CUSUM. HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21 (11): 1505–1512. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.362

21. Tomassini F., Scuderi V., Colman R., Vivarelli M., Montalti R., Troisi R.I. The single surgeon learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection: a continuous evolving process through stepwise difficulties. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95 (43): e5138. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005138