Preview

Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery

Advanced search

Optimization of cholecystectomy timing during staged treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and senile patients with cholecystostomy

https://doi.org/10.16931/1/1995-5464.2024-3-13-21

Abstract

Aim. To determine optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly and senile patients with cholecystostomy.

Materials and methods. Treatment results of 37 patients aged 60 years and over at different terms after cholecystostomy formation were analyzed. The degree of senile asthenia, concomitant diseases, technical features of surgical aid, dynamics of the postoperative period, as well as morphological features of inflammatory changes in the gallbladder wall were assessed.

Results. Pre-asthenia was detected in 12 (32%) patients, mild senile asthenia – in 14 (38%) patients, and moderate senile asthenia – in 11 (30%) patients. Polymorbidity was determined in all patients, with 23 patients having four or more diseases. In 3 (8%), 15 (40.5%), 15 (40.5%), and 4 (11%) cases, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed 3–9 days, 10–30 days, 2–6 months, and 6 months or more (1 conversion) after cholecystostomy.

Conclusion. In elderly and senile patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed 10–30 days after cholecystostomy is optimal, safe, and affordable. Radical intervention in this period is not associated with technical difficulties. Reduced terms of external drainage of the gallbladder contribute to improving the elderly patient’s quality of life and their social adaptation, while shortening the period of postoperative recovery. When planning surgical interventions in a patient over 60 years old, account should be taken of comorbidities, polypragmasy, and senile asthenia.

About the Authors

P. S. Vaganova
Hospital for War Veterans No. 3, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Polina S. Vaganova – Deputy Chief Physician for Outpatient and Polyclinic Work, Surgeon

4, Startovaya str., Moscow, 129336



G. G. Melkonyan
Hospital for War Veterans No. 3, Moscow Healthcare Department; Department of Surgery, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Georgy G. Melkonyan – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Physician, Surgeon

4, Startovaya str., Moscow, 129336

 2/1 bld. 1, Barrikadnaya str., Moscow, 125993



I. M. Buriev
Hospital for War Veterans No. 3, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Ilya M. Buriev – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Surgeon

4, Startovaya str., Moscow, 129336



S. A. Kachurin
Hospital for War Veterans No. 3, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Sergey A. Kachurin – Head of Surgery Department

4, Startovaya str., Moscow, 129336



V. V. Pchelin
Hospital for War Veterans No. 3, Moscow Healthcare Department
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Pchelin – Pathoanatomist

4, Startovaya str., Moscow, 129336



References

1. Huang S.-Z., Chen H.-Q., Liao W.-X., Zhou W.-Y., Chen J.-H., Li W.-C., Zhou H., Liu B., Hu K.P. Comparison of emergency cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg. 2021; 73 (2): 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00894-4

2. Yokoe M., Hata J., Takada T., Strasberg S.-M., Asbun H.-J.,Wakabayashi G., Kozaka K., Endo I., Deziel D.-J., Miura F., Okamoto K., Hwang T.-L., Huang S.-W., Ker C.-G., Chen M.-F., Han H.-S., Yoon Y.-S., Choi I.-S., Noguchi Y., Shikata S., Ukai T., Higuchi R., Gabata T., Mori Y., Iwashita Y., Hibi T., Jagannath P., Jonas E., Liau K.-H., Dervenis C., Gouma D., Cherqui D., Belli G., Garden J., Gimenez M.-E., Santibanes E., Suzuki K., Umezawa A., Supe A.-N., Pitt H.-A., Singh H., Chan A., Lau W.-Y., Teoh А., Honda G., Sugioka А., Asai К., Gomi H., Itoi T., Kiriyama S, Yoshida М., Mayumi T., Matsumura N., Tokumura H., Kitano S., Hirata К., Inui К., Sumiyama Y., Yamamoto М. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2018; 25 (1): 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/JHBP.515

3. Beburishvili A.G., Panin S.I., Zyubina E.N., Nesterov S.S., Puzikova A.V. Cholecystostomy in acute cholecystitis in modern surgical practice. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2020; 6: 44–48. DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202006144 (In Russian)

4. Lee S.O., Yim S.K. Management of acute cholecystitis. Korean J. Gastroenterol. 2018; 71 (5): 264–268. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2018.71.5.264

5. Winbladh A., Gullstrand P., Svanvik J., Sandström P. Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis. HPB. 2009; 11 (3): 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00052.x

6. Chole S. Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br. J. Surg. 2016; 103 (12): 1716–1726. https://doi.org/10.1002/BJS.10288

7. Okamoto K., Suzuki K., Takada T., Strasberg S.M., Asbun H.J., Endo I., Iwashita Y., Hibi T., Pitt H.A., Umezawa A., Asai K., Han H.-S., Hwang T.-L., Mori Y., Yoon Y.-S., Huang W.S.-W., Belli G., Dervenis C., Yokoe M., Kiriyama S., Itoi T., Jagannath P., Garden O.J., Miura F., Nakamura M., Horiguchi A., Wakabayashi G., Cherqui D., de Santibañes E., Shikata S., Noguchi Y., Ukai T., Higuchi R., Wada K., Honda G., Supe A.N., Yoshida M., Mayumi T., Gouma D.J., Deziel D.J., Liau K.-H., Chen M.-F., Shibao K., Liu K.-H., Su C.-H., Chan A.C.W., Yoon D.-S., Choi I.-S., Jonas E., Chen X.-P., Fan S.T., Ker C.-G., Giménez M.E., Kitano S., Inomata M., Hirata K., Inui K., Sumiyama Y., Yamamoto M. 2018, Tokyo Guidelines 2018 flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2018; 25 (1): 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516

8. Kamer E., Cengiz F., Cakir V., Balli O., Acar T., Peskersoy M., Haciyanli M. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with acute cholecystitis: analysis of a single-centre experience and literature review. Prz. Gastroenterol. 2017; 12 (4): 250–255. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2017.72098

9. Calero García R., Garcia-Hidalgo M.A. Basic interventional radiology in the abdomen. Radiologia. 2016; 58 (2): 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2016.03.006

10. Friedrich A.U., Baratta K.P., Lewis J., Adib P., Hadlin M., Demetrius E.-M., Kahan M.-A. Cholecystostomу treatment in an ICU population: complications and risks. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. 2016; 26 (5): 410–416. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.00000000000000319

11. Kim D., Iqbal S.I., Ahari H.K., Molgaard K., Flake S., Davison B.-D. Expanding role of percutaneous cholecystostomy and interventional radiology for the management of acute cholecystitis: an analysis of 144 patients. Diagn. Interv. Imaging. 2018; 99 (1): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2017.04.006

12. Macchini D., Degrate L., Oldani M., Leni D., Padalino P., Romano F., Zanotti L. Timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy tube removal: systematic review. Minerva Chir. 2016; 71 (6): 415–416. PMID: 27280869 13. de Mestral C., Gomez D., Haas B., Zagorski B., Rothstein O.-D., Nathans A.-B. Cholecystostomy: a bridge to hospital discharge but not delayed cholecystectomy. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 74 (1): 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827890e1

13. Ha J.P., Tsui K.K., Tang C.N., Siu V.-T., Fung K.-H. Cholecystectomy or not after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute calculous cholecystitis in high-risk patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008; 55 (86–87): 497–502. PMID: 19102330

14. Tkacheva O.N., Frolova E.V., Yakhno N.N. Geriatriya: nacional'noe rukovodstvo [Geriatrics: National guidelines]. Moscow: GEOTAR Media, 2018. 608 p. (In Russian)

15. Loozen C.S., van Santvoort H.C., van Duijvendijk P., Besselink M.-G., Dirk J., Nieuwenhuizen G., Kelder J.-K., Donkervoort S., Geloven A., Kruyt P., Rus D., Cortram K., Kornmann V., Pronk A., van der Piet D., Crolla R., van Ramshorst B., Bollen T., Boerma J. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus percutaneous catheter drainage for acute cholecystitis in high risk patients (CHOCOLATE): multicentre randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2018; 363: 3965. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k3965

16. Choi J.W., Park S.H., Choi S.Y. Comparison of clinical result between early laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with complicated acute cholecystitis. Korean J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2012; 16 (4): 147–153. https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.4.147

17. Huang S.-Z., Chen H.-Q., LiaoW.-X., Zhou W.-Y., Chen J.-H., Li W.-C., Zhou H., Liu В., Hu K.-P. Comparison of emergency cholecystectomy and delayed cholecystectomy after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg. 2021; 73 (2): 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00894-4

18. Molavi I., Schellenberg A., Christian F. Clinical and operative outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis who are treated initially with image-guided cholecystostomy. Can. J. Surg. 2018; 61 (3): 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.003517


Review

For citations:


Vaganova P.S., Melkonyan G.G., Buriev I.M., Kachurin S.A., Pchelin V.V. Optimization of cholecystectomy timing during staged treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly and senile patients with cholecystostomy. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2024;29(3):13-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1/1995-5464.2024-3-13-21

Views: 206


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)