Immediate and distant results of liver and bile duct resections for portal cholangiocarcinoma in elderly and senile patients
https://doi.org/10.16931/31/1995-5464.2024-3-22-28
Abstract
Aim. Evaluation of surgical outcomes in elderly and senile patients with portal cholangiocarcinoma.
Materials and methods. The immediate and long-term results of surgical treatment of 170 patients with portal cholangiocarcinoma performed in 2013–2023 were analyzed. A comparison of the outcomes in patients aged below 60, 60–74, and over 74 years old was carried out. Factors prognostically associated with a high risk of fatal outcome in elderly and senile patients were determined by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results. The senile patient group was more likely to develop severe complications (p = 0.089) and had a higher 90-day mortality (p = 0.042). The combination of such factors as the Charlson comorbidity index, Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS), resection volume, and surgery duration showed high prognostic significance with respect to hospital mortality, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.895 (p < 0.001). The overall and recurrence-free survival of patients did not differ among all age groups (p = 0.886).
Conclusion. In the absence of appropriate patient selection based on risk factors, the surgical outcomes in senile patients deteriorate. When planning a surgical intervention in senile patients, attention should be paid to minimizing surgical trauma and surgery duration, especially in patients with a high comorbidity index.
About the Authors
M. G. EfanovRussian Federation
Mikhail G. Efanov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
P. V. Tarakanov
Russian Federation
Pavel V. Tarakanov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher of the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
A. A. Koroleva
Russian Federation
Anna A. Koroleva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher of the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
A. N. Vankovich
Russian Federation
Andrey N. Vankovich – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher of the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
D. E. Kovalenko
Russian Federation
Dmitry E. Kovalenko – Researcher of the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
D. V. Fisenko
Russian Federation
Denis V. Fisenko – Researcher the Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
V. V. Tsvirkun
Russian Federation
Victor V. Tsvirkun – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Researcher
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
References
1. Ripamonti L., De Carlis R., Lauterio A., Mangoni I., Frassoni S., Bagnardi V., Centonze L., Poli C., Buscemi V., Ferla F., De Carlis L. Major hepatectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients: is it reasonable? Updates Surg. 2022; 74 (1): 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01111-6
2. Miyazaki M., Kato A., Ito H., Kimura F., Shimizu H., Ohtsuka M., Yoshidome H., Yoshitomi H., Furukawa K., Nozawa S. Combined vascular resection in operative resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does it work or not? Surgery. 2007; 141 (5): 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.016
3. Sawada T., Kita J., Rokkaku K., Kato M., Shimoda M., Kubota K. Outcome of surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008; 55 (88): 1971–1974.
4. Takahashi Y., Ebata T., Yokoyama Y., Igami T., Sugawara G., Nagino M. Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in octogenarians: a single center experience. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2013; 20 (3): 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0529-3
5. Akashi K., Ebata T., Mizuno T., Yokoyama Y., Igami T., Yamaguchi J., Onoe S., Nagino M. Surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma from a viewpoint of age: is it beneficial to octogenarians in an aging society? Surgery. 2018; 164 (5): 1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.051
6. Bartsch F., Baumgart J., Tripke V., Hoppe-Lotichius M., Heinrich S., Lang H. Resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in elderly patients – is it reasonable? BMC Surg. 2019; 19 (1): 157. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0620-7
7. Zhu H., Ji K., Wu W., Zhao S., Zhou J., Zhang C., Tang R., Miao L. Describing treatment patterns for elderly patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and predicting prognosis by a validated model: a population-based study. J. Cancer. 2021; 12 (11): 3114–3125. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.53978
8. Vitale A., Spolverato G., Bagante F., Gani F., Popescu I., Marques H.P., Aldrighetti L., Gamblin T.C., Maithel S.K., Sandroussi C., Bauer T.W., Shen F., Poultsides G.A., Marsh J.W., Pawlik T.M. A multi-institutional analysis of elderly patients undergoing a liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016; 113 (4): 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24148
9. Bejanyan A.L., Bagmet N.N., Nikoda V.V., Zaitsev A.Yu., Sysoev S.Yu., Dymova O.V., Tyan A.G., Frolova Yu.V. Surgical treatment of cancer in the elderly with concomitant cardiovascular pathology. Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky Journal. 2020; 8 (4): 35–42. https://doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2020-8-4-35-42 (In Russian)
10. Zhukova L.G., Izrailov R.E., Semenov N.N., Mikhnevich M.V., Khatkov I.E. Long-term outcomes of combined treatment of primary resectable pancreatic head cancer in patients over 70 years. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2024; 29 (1): 81–89. (In Russ.). https://doi. org/10.16931/10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-81-89 (In Russian)
11.
Review
For citations:
Efanov M.G., Tarakanov P.V., Koroleva A.A., Vankovich A.N., Kovalenko D.E., Fisenko D.V., Tsvirkun V.V. Immediate and distant results of liver and bile duct resections for portal cholangiocarcinoma in elderly and senile patients. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2024;29(3):22-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/31/1995-5464.2024-3-22-28