Initial results of new technological approach to visualization and treatment of bile and pancreatic duct disease
S. A. Budzinskiy,
S. G. Shapovalyants,
E. D. Fedorov,
D. V. Bakhtiozina,
L. M. Mikhaleva,
P. L. Chernyakevich,
E. N. Platonova https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.20192105-116
Abstract
Objective. To evaluate possibilities and advantages of SpyGlass DS system (Boston Scientific) in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreato-biliary diseases.
Material and methods. SpyGlass DS has been applied in 24 interventions in 22 patients for the period from December 6, 2017 to July 6, 2018. There were 21 cholangioscopies, 2 pancreaticoscopies and one cholangiopancreaticoscopy. The indications for cholangioscopy were undifferentiated strictures (n = 14), suspected Mirizzi syndrome (n = 2), large choledocholithiasis and need for laser lithotripsy (n = 1). There was a need to pass a guidewire under visual control (n = 2) and to control bile duct stones extraction (n = 1). Scheduled removal of ligature after laparoscopic cholecystectomy was in 1 case. Indication for pancreaticoscopy was suspected malignancy within the strictures associated with chronic pancreatitis, for cholangiopancreaticoscopy – assessment of spread of major duodenal papilla tumor into common bile and pancreatic ducts.
Results. Overall technical success rate was 95.8% (23/24). Intraductal biopsy was successfully performed in 13 out of 14 (92.9%) cases. Cholangiocarcinoma was histologically confirmed in 6 cases. Curative interventions were performed in all 4 cases. There were no complications and mortality.
Conclusion. The main indications for endoscopic peroral intraductal interventions are various types of undifferentiated and complicated biliary and pancreatic strictures, as well as “difficult” bile and pancreatic duct stones. The technology of diagnostic and curative endoscopic interventions using the SpyGlass DS system is relatively simple while morbidity and mortality rates are similar to those after conventional transpapillary interventions.
About the Authors
S. A. Budzinskiy
Chair of Hospital-based Surgery No. 2 with Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Moscow City Hospital No. 31 of Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav A. Budzinskiy – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Research Fellow of the Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Senior Resident of the Endoscopic Department of the Moscow City Hospital No. 31
1, Ostrovityanova str., Moscow, 117997
2, Lobachevsky str., Moscow, 119415
S. G. Shapovalyants
Chair of Hospital-based Surgery No. 2 with Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey G. Shapovalyants – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Chair of Hospital-Based Surgery No. 2 of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
1, Ostrovityanova str., Moscow, 117997
E. D. Fedorov
Chair of Hospital-based Surgery No. 2 with Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; Moscow City Hospital No. 31 of Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Evgeniy D. Fedorov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Research Fellow of the Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Endoscopist of the Endoscopic Department of the Moscow City Hospital No. 31
1, Ostrovityanova str., Moscow, 117997
2, Lobachevsky str., Moscow, 119415
D. V. Bakhtiozina
Chair of Hospital-based Surgery No. 2 with Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dariya V. Bakhtiozina – Research Fellow of the Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
1, Ostrovityanova str., Moscow, 117997
2-210, Kutuzova str., Moscow, 121354
Phone: + 7-910-469-36-12
L. M. Mikhaleva
Moscow City Hospital No. 31 of Moscow Department of Health; Research Institute of Human Morphology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila M. Mikhaleva – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory of Clinical Morphology of the Research Institute of Human Morphology, Head of the Autopsy Department of the Moscow City Hospital No. 31
2, Lobachevsky str., Moscow, 119415
3, Zurupa str., Moscow, 117418
P. L. Chernyakevich
Moscow City Hospital No. 31 of Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel L. Chernyakevich – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Endoscopic Department of the Moscow City Hospital No. 31
2, Lobachevsky str., Moscow, 119415
E. N. Platonova
Moscow City Hospital No. 31 of Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena N. Platonova – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Care of the Moscow City Hospital No. 31
2, Lobachevsky str., Moscow, 119415
References
1. McCune W.S., Shorb P.E. Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater: a preliminary report. Ann. Surg. 1968; 167 (5): 952–956.
2. Classen M., Demling L. Endoscopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Stein extraktionaus dem Ductus choledochus. Dtsch. Med. Wschr. 1974; 99 (11): 496–497.
3. Kawai K.Y., Ahasaha K., Murakami K., Tada M., Koli Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1974; 20 (4): 148–150.
4. Kozarek R.A. Pancreatic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 2010; 42 (11): 62–68.
5. Albert J., Aabakken L., Ang T.L., Arnelo U., Arvanitakis M., Barthet M., Budzinskiy S., Cremer M., Crisan D., Dechene A., Deviere J., Dunkov Z., Farnik H., Fedorov E., Forti E., Gyokeres T., Hritz I., Johnson G., Katzarov A., Katzarov K., Kronenberger B., Kylanpaa L., Moine O., Moreels T., Mutignani M., Seewald S., Shapovaliants S., Tantau M., Hooft J., Vanbiervliet G. Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) – current practice and future perspectives. Unimed. 2015: 32–35.
6. Nakajima M., Akasaka Y., Yamaguchi K., Fujimoto S., Kawai K. Direct endoscopic visualization of the bile and pancreatic duct systems by peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy (PCPS). Gastrointest. Endosc. 1978; 24 (4): 141–145.
7. Parsi M.A., Li A., Li C., Goggins M. Peroralcholangioscopy in the new millennium. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 17 (1): 1–6. http://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i1.1.
8. Komanduri S., Thosani N., Dayyeh B., Aslanian H.R., Enestvedt B.K., Manfredi M., Maple J.T., Navaneethan U., Pannala R., Parsi M.A., Smith Z.L., Sullivan S.A., Banerjee S. Cholangiopancreatoscopy, status evaluation report. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2016; 84 (2): 209–221. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.013.
9. Osman A., Sipan M., Bulent A. Biliary interventions: tools and techniques of the trade, access, cholangiography, biopsy, cholangioscopy, cholangioplasty, stenting, stone extraction, and brachytherapy. Semin. Intervent. Radiol. 2016; 33 (4): 283–290. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1592327.
10. Chen Y.K., Parsi M.A., Binmoeller K.F., Hawes R.H., Pleskow D.K., Slivka A., Haluszka O., Petersen B.T., Sherman S., Devière J., Meisner S., Stevens P.D., Costamagna G., Ponchon T., Peetermans J.A., Neuhaus H.S. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74 (4): 805–814. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.016.
11. Korrapati P., Ciolino J., Wani S., Shah J., Watson R., Muthusamy V.R., Klapman J., Komanduri S. The efficacy of peroral cholangioscopy for difficult bile duct stones and indeterminate strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc. Int. Open. 2016; 4 (3): E 263–275. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-100194.
12. Navaneethan U., Hasan M.K., Lourdusamy V., Njei B., Varadarajulu S., Hawes R.H. Single-operator cholangioscopy and targeted biopsies in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures: a systematic review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 82 (4): 608–614.e2. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.030.
13. Tringali A., Lemmers A., Meves V., Terheggen G., Pohl J., Manfredi G., Häfner M., Costamagna G., Devière J., Neuhaus H., Caillol F., Giovannini M., Hassan C., Dumonceau J.M. Intraductal biliopancreatic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technology review. Endoscopy. 2015; 47 (8): 739–753.
14. Njei B., McCarty T.R., Varadarajulu S., Navaneethan U. Systematic review with meta-analysis: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016; 44 (11–12): 1139–1151. http://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13817.
15. Nedoluzhko I.Yu., Shishin K.V., Kazakova S.S., Chernikova E.N., Kurushkina N.A Two-stage treatment of patients with large biliary stones. Gastroehnterologiy. Part II. 2015; 2 (103): 30–31. (In Russian)
16. Lenze F., Bokemeyer A., Gross D., Nowacki T., Bettenworth D., Ullerich H. Safety diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy. Un. Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018; 6 (6): 902–909. http://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618764943.
17. Maydeo A., Kwek B.E., Bhandari S., Bapat M., Dhir V. Singleoperator cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic ductal stones. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74 (6): 1308–1314. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.047.
18. Valente R., Urban O., Del Chiaro M., Capurso G., Blomberg J., Löhr J.M., Arnelo U. ERCP-directed radiofrequency ablation of ampullary adenomas: a knife-sparing alternative in patients unfit for surgery. Endoscopy. 2015; 47 (Suppl. 1 UCTN): E515– E516. http://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.41.
19. Sakamoto H., Kitano M., Kamata K., Miyata T., Kadosaka K., Imai H., Takeyama Y., Kudo M. Transcatheter endoscopy for pancreaticobiliary duct diseases (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 76 (4): 892–899. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.06.012.
20. Kotovsky A.E. Diagnosticheskie i lechebnye ehndoskopicheskie vmeshatel'stva pri khirurgicheskih zabolevaniyah podzheludochnoj zhelezy [Diagnostic and curative endoscopic interventions for surgical pancreatic diseases]: autoref. dis. … doct. of med. sci. Moscow, 1990. 30 p. (In Russian)
21. Kotovsky A.E., Pozdeev I.V., Tupikin L.V. Long-term results of endoscopic papillosphincterotomy. Аnnaly khirurgicheskoj gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 1997; 2: 132–135. (In Russian)
22. Gorev M.P. Kholangiopankreatikoskopiya v diagnostike i lechenii khirurgicheskih zabolevanij zhelchevyvodyashchih putej [Cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of surgical diseases of the bile ducts]: autoref. dis. … cand. of med. sci. Moscow, 1993. 23 p. (In Russian)
23. Novikov A., Xu M.M., Tyberg A., Kahaleh M. Endoscopic management of chronic pancreatitis with a fully covered selfexpanding metal stent and laser lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 2017; 19 (12): E296–E297. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-118214.
24. Goodchild G., Sivalokanathan S., Webster G. Cholangioscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy in the management of fistulated pancreatic duct stones. Endoscopy. 2018; 50 (7): E163–E164. http://doi.org/10.1055/a-0599-0280.
25. Hodo Y., Shirota Y., Suda T., Wakabayashi T. Transcatheter pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for large pancreatic duct stones. Endoscopy. 2017; 49 (06): E147–E148. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-105575.
26. Adler D.G., Cox K., Milliken M., Taylor L.J., Loren D., Kowalski T., Francis G., Laique S.N., Siddiqui A. A large multicenter analysis of adverse events associated with single operator cholangiopancreatoscopy. Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. 2015; 61 (4): 179–184.
27. Chandrasekhara V., Mouen A. Adverse events associated with ERCP, guideline. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2017; 85 (1): 32–47. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051.
Review
For citations:
Budzinskiy S.A., Shapovalyants S.G., Fedorov E.D., Bakhtiozina D.V., Mikhaleva L.M., Chernyakevich P.L., Platonova E.N. Initial results of new technological approach to visualization and treatment of bile and pancreatic duct disease. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2019;24(2):105-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.20192105-116
Views:
838
Email this article 