Preview

Анналы хирургической гепатологии

Расширенный поиск

Гастростаз после панкреатодуоденальной резекции: вопросы терминологии и профилактики

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-3-100-107

Аннотация

Гастростаз – частое осложнение панкреатодуоденальной резекции, недостаточно освещенное в отечественной литературе. В обзоре рассмотрены вопросы терминологии и современной классификации гастростаза. Представлены возможности профилактики указанного осложнения с позиции доказательной медицины.

Об авторах

М. Н. Каминский
ЧУЗ “Клиническая больница «РЖД-Медицина» г. Хабаровск”; ФГБОУ ВО “Дальневосточный государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава России
Россия

Каминский Максим Николаевич – канд. мед. наук, врач-хирург хирургического отделения №1; ассистент кафедры общей и клинической хирургии

680022, Хабаровск, ул. Воронежская, д. 49, Российская Федерация

680000, Хабаровск, ул. Муравьева-Амурского, д. 35, Российская Федерация



С. Н. Качалов
ФГБОУ ВО “Дальневосточный государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава России
Россия

Качалов Сергей Николаевич – канд. мед. наук, доцент кафедры общей и клинической хирургии

680000, Хабаровск, ул. Муравьева-Амурского, д. 35, Российская Федерация



Д. В. Иванов
КГБУЗ “Онкологический диспансер”
Россия

Иванов Дмитрий Владимирович – врач-онколог хирургического отделения

681000, Комсомольск-на-Амуре, ул. Уссурийская, д. 5, Российская Федерация



С. Н. Рахимова
ЧУЗ “Клиническая больница «РЖД-Медицина» г. Хабаровск”
Россия

Рахимова Ситора Нуриддиновна – врач-хирург хирургического отделения №1

680022, Хабаровск, ул. Воронежская, д. 49, Российская Федерация



Список литературы

1. Griffin J.F., Poruk K.E., Wolfgang C.L. Pancreatic cancer surgery: past, present, and future. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2015; 27 (4): 332–348. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.07

2. Qiu J., Li M., Du C. Antecolic reconstruction is associated with a lower incidence of delayed gastric emptying compared to retrocolic technique after Whipple or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98 (34): e16663. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016663

3. Futagawa Y., Kanehira M., Furukawa K., Kitamura H., Yoshida S., Usuba T., Misawa T., Okamoto T., Yanaga K. Impact of delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy on survival. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2017; 24 (8): 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.482.

4. Shabunin A.V., Tavobilov M.M., Karpov A.A. Functional state of the stomach and small bowel after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2016; 21 (2): 62–67. https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2016262-67 (In Russian)

5. Kubishkin V.A., Vishnevskiy V.A. Rak podzheludochnoy zhelezi [Pancreatic cancer]. Moscow: Medpractica-M, 2003. 375 p. (In Russian)

6. Camilleri M., Parkman H.P., Shafi M.A., Abell T.L., Gerson L. American College of Gastroenterology. Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 108 (1): 18–37; quiz 38. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2012.373

7. Camilleri M., Chedid V., Ford A.C., Haruma K., Horowitz M., Jones K.L., Low P.A., Park S.Y., Parkman H.P., Stanghellini V. Gastroparesis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2018; 4 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0038-z

8. Martignoni M.E., Friess H., Sell F., Ricken L., Shrikhande S., Kulli C., Büchler M.W. Enteral nutrition prolongs delayed gastric emptying in patients after Whipple resection. Am. J. Surg. 2000; 180 (1): 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00418-9

9. Yeo C.J., Barry M.K., Sauter P.K., Sostre S., Lillemoe K.D., Pitt H.A., Cameron J.L. Erythromycin accelerates gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 1993; 218 (3): 229–237; discussion 237–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199309000-00002

10. Tani M., Terasawa H., Kawai M., Ina S., Hirono S., Uchiyama K., Yamaue H. Improvement of delayed gastric emptying in pyloruspreserving pancreaticoduodenectomy: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2006; 243 (3): 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000201479.84934.ca

11. Wente M.N., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Fingerhut A., Gouma D.J., Izbicki J.R., Neoptolemos J.P., Padbury R.T., Sarr M.G., Traverso L.W., Yeo C.J., Büchler M.W. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2007; 142 (5): 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.05.005

12. Huang W., Xiong J.J., Wan M.H., Szatmary P., Bharucha S., Gomatos I., Nunes Q.M., Xia Q., Sutton R., Liu X.B. Metaanalysis of subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy vs pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J. Gastroenterol. 2015; 21 (20): 6361–6373. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i20.6361

13. Yamaguchi K., Tanaka M., Chijiiwa K., Nagakawa T., Imamura M., Takada T. Early and late complications of pyloruspreserving pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan 1998. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 1999; 6 (3): 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005340050122

14. Wu W., Hong X., Fu L., Liu S., You L., Zhou L., Zhao Y. The effect of pylorus removal on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 2,599 patients. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (10): e108380. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108380

15. Kawai M., Tani M., Hirono S., Miyazawa M., Shimizu A., Uchiyama K., Yamaue H. Pylorus ring resection reduces delayed gastric emptying in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of pylorus-resecting versus pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2011; 253 (3): 495–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820d98f1

16. Kurahara H., Takao S., Shinchi H., Mataki Y., Maemura K., Sakoda M., Ueno S., Natsugoe S. Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) prevents postoperative delayed gastric emptying. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010; 102 (6): 615–619. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21687

17. Varghese C., Bhat S., Wang T.H., O'Grady G., Pandana boyana S. Impact of gastric resection and enteric anastomotic configuration on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. BJS Open. 2021; 5 (3): zrab035. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrab035

18. Müller P.C., Ruzza C., Kuemmerli C., Steinemann D.C., Müller S.A., Kessler U., Z'graggen K. 4/5 gastrectomy in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces delayed gastric emptying. J. Surg. Res. 2020; 249: 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.12.028

19. Warshaw A.L., Torchiana D.L. Delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1985; 160 (1): 1–4.

20. Zhou Y., Lin L., Wu L., Xu D., Li B. A case-matched comparison and meta-analysis comparing pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for the incidence of postoperative delayed gastric emptying. HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17 (4): 337–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12358

21. Klaiber U., Probst P., Strobel O., Michalski C.W., Dörr- Harim C., Diener M.K., Büchler M.W., Hackert T. Metaanalysis of delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreatoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2018; 105 (4): 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10771

22. Bell R., Pandanaboyana S., Shah N., Bartlett A., Windsor J.A., Smith A.M. Meta-analysis of antecolic versus retrocolic gastric reconstruction after a pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2015; 17 (3): 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12344

23. Su A.P., Cao S.S., Zhang Y., Zhang Z.D., Hu W.M., Tian B.L. Does antecolic reconstruction for duodenojejunostomy improve delayed gastric emptying after pylorus-preserving pancreatico duodenectomy? A systematic review and metaanalysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 18 (43): 6315–6323. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i43.6315

24. Cao S.S., Lin Q.Y., He M.X., Zhang G.Q. Effect of antecolic versus retrocolic reconstruction for gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Surg. Practice. 2014; 18: 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-1633.12055

25. Zhou Y., Lin J., Wu L., Li B., Li H. Effect of antecolic or retrocolic reconstruction of the gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2015; 15: 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0300-8

26. Joliat G.R., Labgaa I., Demartines N., Schäfer M., Allemann P. Effect of antecolic versus retrocolic gastroenteric reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy on delayed gastric emptying: a meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials. Dig. Surg. 2016; 33 (1): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441480

27. Huang M.Q., Li M., Mao J.Y., Tian B.L. Braun enteroenterostomy reduces delayed gastric emptying: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2015; 23 (Pt A): 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.038

28. Zhou Y., Hu B., Wei K., Si X. Braun anastomosis lowers the incidence of delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018; 18 (1): 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0909-5

29. Hwang H.K., Lee S.H., Han D.H., Choi S.H., Kang C.M., Lee W.J. Impact of Braun anastomosis on reducing delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2016; 23 (6): 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.349

30. Fujieda H., Yokoyama Y., Hirata A., Usui H., Sakatoku Y., Fukaya M., Nagino M. Does Braun anastomosis have an impact on the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and the extent of intragastric bile reflux following pancreatoduodenectomy? – A randomized controlled study. Dig. Surg. 2017; 34 (6): 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455334

31. Kakaei F., Beheshtirouy S., Nejatollahi S.M., Rashidi I., Asvadi T., Habibzadeh A., Oliaei-Motlagh M. Effects of adding Braun jejunojejunostomy to standard Whipple procedure on reduction of afferent loop syndrome – a randomized clinical trial. Can. J. Surg. 2015; 58 (6): 383–388. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005215

32. Xiao Y., Hao X., Yang Q., Li M., Wen J., Jiang C. Effect of Billroth-II versus Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastrojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy on delayed gastric emptying: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 2021; 28 (5): 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.828

33. Busquets J., Martín S., Fabregat J., Secanella L., Pelaez N., Ramos E. Randomized trial of two types of gastrojejuno stomy after pancreatoduodenectomy and risk of delayed gastric emptying (PAUDA trial). Br. J. Surg. 2019; 106 (1): 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11023

34. Herrera Cabezón J., Sánchez Acedo P., TarifaCastilla A., ZazpeRipa C. Delayed gastric emptying following pancreatoduodenectomy: a Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy vs Billroth II gastrojejunostomy randomized study. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2019; 111 (1): 34–39. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2018.5744/2018

35. Shimoda M., Kubota K., Katoh M., Kita J. Effect of Billroth II or Roux-en-Y reconstruction for the gastrojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled study. Ann. Surg. 2013; 257 (5): 938–942. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826c3f90

36. Tani M., Kawai M., Hirono S., Okada K.I., Miyazawa M., Shimizu A., Kitahata Y., Yamaue H. Randomized clinical trial of isolated Roux-en-Y versus conventional reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 2014; 101 (9): 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9544

37. Hayama S., Senmaru N., Hirano S. Delayed gastric emptying after pancreatoduodenectomy: comparison between invaginated pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy. BMC Surg. 2020; 20 (1): 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00707-w

38. Bassi C., Falconi M., Molinari E., Salvia R., Butturini G., Sartori N., Mantovani W., Pederzoli P. Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann. Surg. 2005; 242 (6): 767–771, discussion 771–773. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000189124.47589.6d

39. Jin Y., Feng Y.Y., Qi X.G., Hao G., Yu Y.Q., Li J.T., Peng S.Y. Pancreatogastrostomy vs pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs and our experience. World J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019; 11 (7): 322–332. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i7.322

40. Palanivelu C., Senthilnathan P., Sabnis S.C., Babu N.S., Srivatsan Gurumurthy S., Anand Vijai N., Nalankilli V.P., Praveen Raj P., Parthasarathy R., Rajapandian S. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br. J. Surg. 2017; 104 (11): 1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10662

41. van Hilst J., de Rooij T., Bosscha K., Brinkman D.J., van Dieren S., Dijkgraaf M.G., Gerhards M.F., de Hingh I.H., Karsten T.M., Lips D.J., Luyer M.D., Busch O.R., Festen S., Besselink M.G. Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019; 4 (3): 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4

42. Poves I., Burdío F., Morató O., Iglesias M., Radosevic A., Ilzarbe L., Visa L., Grande L. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2018; 268 (5): 731–739. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002893

43. Zhang H., Lan X., Peng B., Li B. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A metaanalysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019; 25 (37): 5711–5731. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i37.5711

44. Ausania F., Landi F., Martínez-Pérez A., Fondevila C. A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2019; 21 (12): 1613–1620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.05.017

45. Lin D., Yu Z., Chen X., Chen W., Zou Y., Hu J. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2020; 112 (1): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2019.6343/2019

46. Mack L.A., Kaklamanos I.G., Livingstone A.S., Levi J.U., Robinson C., Sleeman D., Franceschi D., Bathe O.F. Gastric decompression and enteral feeding through a double-lumen gastrojejunostomy tube improves outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240 (5): 845–851. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000143299.72623.73

47. Tomomasa T., Kuroume T., Arai H., Wakabayashi K., Itoh Z. Erythromycin induces migrating motor complex in human gastro intestinal tract. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1986; 31 (2): 157–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01300701

48. Ohwada S., Satoh Y., Kawate S., Yamada T., Kawamura O., Koyama T., Yoshimura S., Tomizawa N., Ogawa T., Morishita Y. Low-dose erythromycin reduces delayed gastric emptying and improves gastric motility after Billroth I pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2001; 234 (5): 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200111000-00013

49. Riall T.S., Cameron J.L., Lillemoe K.D. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma – part 3: update on 5-year survival. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2005; 9 (9): 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.034


Дополнительные файлы

Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Каминский М.Н., Качалов С.Н., Иванов Д.В., Рахимова С.Н. Гастростаз после панкреатодуоденальной резекции: вопросы терминологии и профилактики. Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2022;27(3):100-107. https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-3-100-107

For citation:


Kaminskiy M.N., Kachalov S.N., Ivanov D.V., Rakhimova S.N. Gastric stasis following pancreatoduodenal resection: terminology and prevention issues. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2022;27(3):100-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-3-100-107

Просмотров: 1296


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)