Preview

Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery

Advanced search

Selection of a portosystemic shunt placement procedure (TIPS) in the treatment of complicated portal hypertension

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-2-20-30

Abstract

Aim. To improve treatment results in patients with the life-threatening complications of cirrhotic portal hypertension by making an informed choice of the optimal TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) variant.

Materials and methods. A total of 234 patients suffering from the complications of cirrhotic portal hypertension underwent TIPS placement. The indications for shunt placement include esophageal and gastric varices exhibiting the signs of bleeding or carrying the risk of rebleeding (in 172 patients), refractory ascites (in 57 patients), and portal vein thrombosis in the setting of cirrhosis (in 5 patients). Patients from Group 1 underwent shunt placement together with the embolization of inflow pathways to esophageal and gastric varices. In Group 2, priority was given to perioperative therapy, while shunt placement was used together with embolization only in cases of severe varices. In Group 3, the shunt placement stage was combined with the portal blood flow restoration. Immediate and late results were studied in terms of complications, as well as mortality rate and survival rates.

Results. The maximum observation duration amounted to 140 months (11.7 years). TIPS efficacy in all patients was confirmed by a statistically significant decrease in the portosystemic pressure gradient. In Group 1, the highest mortality rate associated with rebleeding was observed in patients who had undergone only shunt placement (30.6%), while the lowest rate was noted in patients whose inflow pathways to varices had first been embolized and who then had undergone intrahepatic shunt placement (7.1%). Patients in Group 2 exhibited a reduction in ascites and the severity of varices. The technical feasibility of TIPS in the setting of portal vein thrombosis was enhanced by experience accumulation and preoperative planning relying on careful interpretation of computed splenoportography data.

Conclusion. It is reasonable to combine the shunt placement stage of TIPS for variceal bleeding with selective embolization of all radiologically detected inflow pathways to gastroesophageal varices. If the portal vein thrombosis is not accompanied by cavernous transformation, TIPS can achieve effective portal decompression provided the portal blood flow is restored.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Khoronko
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Yury V. Khoronko – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy, Surgeon at the Surgical Department

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



N. G. Sapronova
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Natalia G. Sapronova – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Associated Professor, Head of Department of Surgical Diseases No. 1

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



E. V. Kosovtsev
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Evgeny V. Kosovtsev – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Radiosurgical Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



E. Yu. Khoronko
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Evgeny Yu. Khoronko – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associated Prof. at the Department of Surgical Diseases No. 1, Surgeon at the Surgical Department

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



R. N. Kantsurov
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Roman N. Kantsurov – Graduate Student, Department of Surgical Diseases No. 1

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



I. A. Ashimov
Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Ilyaz A. Ashimov – Graduate Student, Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy

29, Nakhichevanskiy per., Rostov-on-Don, 344022



References

1. Zatevakhin I.I., Shipovskii V.N., Tsitsiashvili M.Sh., Monakhov D.V. Portal’naya gipertenziya:diagnostika i lechenie. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. (Portal hypertension: diagnostics and treatment. Practical guidelines). M.: Buki Vedi Publ.; 2015. 328 p. (In Russian).

2. Fink M.A. (2019). Portal hypertension and surgery on the patient with cirrhosis. Chapter 24. In Textbook of Surgery (eds J.A. Smith, A.H. Kaye, C. Christophi and W.A. Brown). Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2019. pp. 219-226. DOI: 10.1002/9781119468189.ch24

3. Shertsinger A.G., Chzhao A.V., Ivashkin V.T., Maevskaya M.V., Pavlov Ch.S., Vertkin A.L., Ogurtsov P.P., Lopatkina T.N., Kotiv B.N., Dzidzava I.I., Anisimov A.Yu., Prudkov M.I., Khoronko Yu.V., Nazyrov F.G., Devyatov A.V., Kitsenko E.A. Treatment of variceal esophageal and gastric bleeding. Annaly khirurgicheskoi gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2013; 18 (3): 110-129. (In Russian).

4. Garcia-Tsao, G., Abraldes J.G., Berzigotti A., Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017; 65 (1): 310-335. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28906

5. Ivashkin V. T., Maevskaya M. V., Pavlov Ch. S., Fedosyina E. A., Bessonova E.N., Pirogova I. Yu., Garbuzenko D.V. Treatment of liver cirrhosis complications: Clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Liver Siciety and Russian Gastroenterological Association. Ross z gastroenterol gepatol koloproktol. 2016; 26 (4): 71-102. (In Russian). DOI: 10.22416/1382-4376-2016-26-4-71-102

6. Unger L.W., Stork T., Bucsics T., Rasoul-Rockenschaub S., Staufer K., Trauner M., Maschke S., Pawloff M., Soliman T., Reiberger T., Berlakovich G. The role of TIPS in the management of liver transplant candidates. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5 (8): 1100-1107. DOI: 10.1177/2050640617704807

7. Zaccherini G., Tufoni M., Iannone G., Caraceni P. Management of Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: An Update. J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 5226. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225226

8. Rajesh S., George T., Philips C.A., Ahamed R.,Kumbar S.,Mohan N., Mohanan M., Augustine P. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in cirrhosis: An exhaustive critical update. World J Gastroenterol. 2020; 26 (37): 5561-5596. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i37.5561

9. Lebezev V.M., Manukyan G.V., Fandeev E.E., Kitsenko E.A., Musin R.A., Kosakevich E.A., Rizaeva S.A., Bobyleva Y.S. ”Left gastric vein to inferior vena cava” bypass in patients with portal hypertension.Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2020;25(1):27-37. (In Russian). DOI: 10.16931/1995-5464.2020127-37

10. Brand M., Prodehl L., Ede C.J. Surgical portosystemic shunts versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for variceal haemorrhage in people with cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; (10): CD001023. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001023.pub3

11. Pandhi M.B., Kuei A.J., Lipnik A.J., Gaba R.C. Emergent Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Creation in Acute Variceal Bleeding. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020; 37 (1): 3-13. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3402015

12. Khan F., Tripathi D. Role of early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt in acute variceal bleeding: An update of the evidence and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2021; 27 (44): 7612-7624. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7612

13. Hernandez-Gea V., Procopet B., Giraldez A., Amitrano L., Villanueva C., Thabut D., Ibanes-Samaniego L., Silva-Junior G., Martinez J. Preemptive-TIPS Improves Outcome in High-Risk Variceal Bleeding: An Observational Study. Hepatology. 2019; 69 (1): 282-293. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30182

14. Lo G.H. Letter to the Editor: Preemptive TIPS Must Be the Treatment of Choice for Child-Pugh Class C Patients With Variceal Bleeding? Hepatology. 2019; 70 (2): 752-753. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30608

15. Lipnik A.J., Pandhi M.B., Khabbaz R.C., Gaba R.C. Endovascular Treatment for Variceal Hemorrhage: TIPS, BRTO, and Combined Approaches. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2018; 35 (3): 169–184. DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1660795

16. Yu J., Wang X., Jiang M., Ma H, Zhou Z., Yang L., Li X. Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) alone and combined with embolisation for the management of cardiofundal varices: a retrospective study. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29 (2): 699-706. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5645-2

17. Shah K.Y., Ren A., Simpson R.O., Kloster M.L., Mikolajczuk A., Bui J.T., Lipnik A.J., Niemeyer M.M., Ray C.E., Gaba R.C. Combined Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Plus Variceal Obliteration versus Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Alone for the Management of Gastric Varices: Comparative Single-Center Clinical Outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021; 32 (2): 282-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.10.009

18. Manukyan G.V., Shertsinger A.G. Differential surgical treatment of patients with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Part I. Estimation of severity of disease and choice of method of surgical treatment. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2015; 2 (1): 10-13. (In Russian). DOI: 1016931/1995-5464.2018476-85.

19. Testino G. Hepatorenal syndrome: role of the transjugular intrahepatic stent shunt in real life practice. Clujul Med. 2018; 90 (4): 464-465. DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-847


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Khoronko Yu.V., Sapronova N.G., Kosovtsev E.V., Khoronko E.Yu., Kantsurov R.N., Ashimov I.A. Selection of a portosystemic shunt placement procedure (TIPS) in the treatment of complicated portal hypertension. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2022;27(2):20-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2022-2-20-30

Views: 716


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)