Preview

Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery

Advanced search

Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resections for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma

https://doi.org/10.16931//1995-5464.2022-3-13-21

Abstract

Aim. To evaluate short- and long-term results of laparoscopic and open surgeries for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma.

Materials and Methods. The paper presents the retrospectively studied results of laparoscopic and open liver resections in 53 patients (2015–2020). The selection of patients for laparoscopic surgery consisted in maintaining the possibility of performing an R0 resection. A comparison was made before and after the alignment of the groups in relation to the complexity of resection due to the exclusion of resections and the reconstructions of vessels and bile ducts.

Results. 53 patients were operated on; 19 patients underwent laparoscopic resection. In the open group, resection and reconstruction of vessels and bile ducts were performed significantly more often. A significantly lower incidence of severe complications and bile leakage was noted in the laparoscopic group, which did not affect the duration of hospital stay. After eliminating the differences in resection complexity, the comparison showed lower blood loss and biliary complications as well as a higher R0 resection rate in the laparoscopic group. The overall and recurrence-free four-year survival did not differ in the groups before and after aligning in terms of resection complexity.

Conclusion. The first experience of using laparoscopic access for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma indicates that it is possible to improve the immediate results of treatment without worsening short- and long-term oncological outcomes.

About the Authors

M. G. Efanov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Mikhail G. Efanov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Chief Physician of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



R. B. Alikhanov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Ruslan B. Alikhanov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



I. V. Kazakov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Ivan V. Kazakov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



N. N. Britskaia
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Natalia N. Britskaia – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Doctoral Candidate

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



Y. V. Kulezneva
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Yuliya V. Kulezneva – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiological Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



O. V. Melekhina
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Olga V. Melekhina – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Radiological Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



A. N. Vankovich
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Andrey N. Vankovich – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



A. A. Koroleva
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Anna A. Koroleva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



N. D. Kulikova
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Natalia D. Kulikova – Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



E. N. Zamanov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Ekhtibar N. Zamanov – Doctoral Candidate

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



V. V. Tsvirkun
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Victor V. Tsvirkun – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Researcher

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



I. E. Khatkov
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov
Russian Federation

Igor E. Khatkov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation



References

1. Guerrini G.P., Esposito G., Tarantino G., Serra V., Olivieri T., Catellani B., Assirati G., Guidetti C., Ballarin R., Magistri P., Di Benedetto F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the first meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2020; 405 (3): 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01877-0

2. Haber P.K., Wabitsch S., Kästner A., Andreou A., Krenzien F., Schöning W., Pratschke J., Schmelzle M. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2020; 30 (12): 1354–1359. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0215

3. Wei F., Wang G., Ding J., Dou C., Yu T., Zhang C. Is it time to consider laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2020; 24 (10): 2244–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04404-9

4. Uy B.J., Han H.S., Yoon Y.S., Cho J.Y. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2015; 25 (4): 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0233

5. Ratti F., Cipriani F., Ariotti R., Gagliano A., Paganelli M., Catena M., Aldrighetti L. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based casematched analysis from a single institution. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (5): 1999–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4430-4

6. Lee W., Park J.H., Kim J.Y., Kwag S.J., Park T., Jeong S.H., Ju Y.T., Jung E.J., Lee Y.J., Hong S.C., Choi S.K., Jeong C.Y. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (11): 4835–4840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4817-x

7. Machairas N., Kostakis I.D., Schizas D., Kykalos S., Nikiteas N., Sotiropoulos G.C. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg. 2021; 73 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00930-3

8. Ratti F., Rawashdeh A., Cipriani F., Primrose J., Fiorentini G., Abu Hilal M., Aldrighetti L. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35 (4): 1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07588-3

9. Regmi P., Hu H.J., Paudyal P., Liu F., Ma W.J., Yin C.H., Jin Y.W., Li F.Y. Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 47 (5): 979–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.310

10. Efanov M., Granov D., Alikhanov R., Rutkin I., Tsvirkun V., Kazakov I., Vankovich A., Koroleva A., Kovalenko D. Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35 (1): 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07363-z

11. Tol J.A., Gouma D.J., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Montorsi M., Adham M., Andrén-Sandberg A., Asbun H.J., Bockhorn M., Büchler M.W., Conlon K.C., Fernández-Cruz L., Fingerhut A., Friess H., Hartwig W., Izbicki J.R., Lillemoe K.D., Milicevic M.N., Neoptolemos J.P., Shrikhande S.V., Vollmer C.M., Yeo C.J., Charnley R.M.; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014; 156 (3): 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016

12. Chen J., Bai T., Zhang Y., Xie Z.B., Wang X.B., Wu F.X., Li L.Q. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015; 8 (11): 20679–20689.

13. Abu Hilal M., Aldrighetti L., Dagher I., Edwin B., Troisi R.I., Alikhanov R., Aroori S., Belli G., Besselink M., Briceno J., Gayet B., D'Hondt M., Lesurtel M., Menon K., Lodge P., Rotellar F., Santoyo J., Scatton O., Soubrane O., Sutcliffe R., Van Dam R., White S., Halls M.C., Cipriani F., Van der Poel M., Ciria R., Barkhatov L., Gomez-Luque Y., Ocana-Garcia S., Cook A., Buell J., Clavien P.A., Dervenis C., Fusai G., Geller D., Lang H., Primrose J., Taylor M., Van Gulik T., Wakabayashi G., Asbun H., Cherqui D. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann. Surg. 2018; 268 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524

14. Ratti F., Fiorentini G., Cipriani F., Paganelli M., Catena M., Aldrighetti L. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors: a propensity- score-based, case-matched analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019; 26 (2): 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Efanov M.G., Alikhanov R.B., Kazakov I.V., Britskaia N.N., Kulezneva Y.V., Melekhina O.V., Vankovich A.N., Koroleva A.A., Kulikova N.D., Zamanov E.N., Tsvirkun V.V., Khatkov I.E. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resections for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2022;27(3):13-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931//1995-5464.2022-3-13-21

Views: 336


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)