Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resections for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma
https://doi.org/10.16931//1995-5464.2022-3-13-21
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate short- and long-term results of laparoscopic and open surgeries for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma.
Materials and Methods. The paper presents the retrospectively studied results of laparoscopic and open liver resections in 53 patients (2015–2020). The selection of patients for laparoscopic surgery consisted in maintaining the possibility of performing an R0 resection. A comparison was made before and after the alignment of the groups in relation to the complexity of resection due to the exclusion of resections and the reconstructions of vessels and bile ducts.
Results. 53 patients were operated on; 19 patients underwent laparoscopic resection. In the open group, resection and reconstruction of vessels and bile ducts were performed significantly more often. A significantly lower incidence of severe complications and bile leakage was noted in the laparoscopic group, which did not affect the duration of hospital stay. After eliminating the differences in resection complexity, the comparison showed lower blood loss and biliary complications as well as a higher R0 resection rate in the laparoscopic group. The overall and recurrence-free four-year survival did not differ in the groups before and after aligning in terms of resection complexity.
Conclusion. The first experience of using laparoscopic access for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma indicates that it is possible to improve the immediate results of treatment without worsening short- and long-term oncological outcomes.
About the Authors
M. G. EfanovRussian Federation
Mikhail G. Efanov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Chief Physician of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
R. B. Alikhanov
Russian Federation
Ruslan B. Alikhanov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
I. V. Kazakov
Russian Federation
Ivan V. Kazakov – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
N. N. Britskaia
Russian Federation
Natalia N. Britskaia – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Doctoral Candidate
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
Y. V. Kulezneva
Russian Federation
Yuliya V. Kulezneva – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiological Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
O. V. Melekhina
Russian Federation
Olga V. Melekhina – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Radiological Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
A. N. Vankovich
Russian Federation
Andrey N. Vankovich – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
A. A. Koroleva
Russian Federation
Anna A. Koroleva – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
N. D. Kulikova
Russian Federation
Natalia D. Kulikova – Researcher, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
E. N. Zamanov
Russian Federation
Ekhtibar N. Zamanov – Doctoral Candidate
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
V. V. Tsvirkun
Russian Federation
Victor V. Tsvirkun – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Researcher
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
I. E. Khatkov
Russian Federation
Igor E. Khatkov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
86, Shosse Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123, Russian Federation
References
1. Guerrini G.P., Esposito G., Tarantino G., Serra V., Olivieri T., Catellani B., Assirati G., Guidetti C., Ballarin R., Magistri P., Di Benedetto F. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the first meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2020; 405 (3): 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-01877-0
2. Haber P.K., Wabitsch S., Kästner A., Andreou A., Krenzien F., Schöning W., Pratschke J., Schmelzle M. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2020; 30 (12): 1354–1359. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0215
3. Wei F., Wang G., Ding J., Dou C., Yu T., Zhang C. Is it time to consider laparoscopic hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2020; 24 (10): 2244–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04404-9
4. Uy B.J., Han H.S., Yoon Y.S., Cho J.Y. Laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A. 2015; 25 (4): 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0233
5. Ratti F., Cipriani F., Ariotti R., Gagliano A., Paganelli M., Catena M., Aldrighetti L. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based casematched analysis from a single institution. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (5): 1999–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4430-4
6. Lee W., Park J.H., Kim J.Y., Kwag S.J., Park T., Jeong S.H., Ju Y.T., Jung E.J., Lee Y.J., Hong S.C., Choi S.K., Jeong C.Y. Comparison of perioperative and oncologic outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (11): 4835–4840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4817-x
7. Machairas N., Kostakis I.D., Schizas D., Kykalos S., Nikiteas N., Sotiropoulos G.C. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Updates Surg. 2021; 73 (1): 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00930-3
8. Ratti F., Rawashdeh A., Cipriani F., Primrose J., Fiorentini G., Abu Hilal M., Aldrighetti L. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as the new field of implementation of laparoscopic liver resection programs. A comparative propensity score-based analysis of open and laparoscopic liver resections. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35 (4): 1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07588-3
9. Regmi P., Hu H.J., Paudyal P., Liu F., Ma W.J., Yin C.H., Jin Y.W., Li F.Y. Is laparoscopic liver resection safe for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 47 (5): 979–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.310
10. Efanov M., Granov D., Alikhanov R., Rutkin I., Tsvirkun V., Kazakov I., Vankovich A., Koroleva A., Kovalenko D. Expanding indications for laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of posterosuperior liver segments in patients with colorectal metastases: comparison with open hepatectomy for immediate and long-term outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35 (1): 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07363-z
11. Tol J.A., Gouma D.J., Bassi C., Dervenis C., Montorsi M., Adham M., Andrén-Sandberg A., Asbun H.J., Bockhorn M., Büchler M.W., Conlon K.C., Fernández-Cruz L., Fingerhut A., Friess H., Hartwig W., Izbicki J.R., Lillemoe K.D., Milicevic M.N., Neoptolemos J.P., Shrikhande S.V., Vollmer C.M., Yeo C.J., Charnley R.M.; International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014; 156 (3): 591–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016
12. Chen J., Bai T., Zhang Y., Xie Z.B., Wang X.B., Wu F.X., Li L.Q. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015; 8 (11): 20679–20689.
13. Abu Hilal M., Aldrighetti L., Dagher I., Edwin B., Troisi R.I., Alikhanov R., Aroori S., Belli G., Besselink M., Briceno J., Gayet B., D'Hondt M., Lesurtel M., Menon K., Lodge P., Rotellar F., Santoyo J., Scatton O., Soubrane O., Sutcliffe R., Van Dam R., White S., Halls M.C., Cipriani F., Van der Poel M., Ciria R., Barkhatov L., Gomez-Luque Y., Ocana-Garcia S., Cook A., Buell J., Clavien P.A., Dervenis C., Fusai G., Geller D., Lang H., Primrose J., Taylor M., Van Gulik T., Wakabayashi G., Asbun H., Cherqui D. The Southampton Consensus Guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann. Surg. 2018; 268 (1): 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002524
14. Ratti F., Fiorentini G., Cipriani F., Paganelli M., Catena M., Aldrighetti L. Perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open lymphadenectomy for biliary tumors: a propensity- score-based, case-matched analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019; 26 (2): 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6811-0
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Efanov M.G., Alikhanov R.B., Kazakov I.V., Britskaia N.N., Kulezneva Y.V., Melekhina O.V., Vankovich A.N., Koroleva A.A., Kulikova N.D., Zamanov E.N., Tsvirkun V.V., Khatkov I.E. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic resections for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2022;27(3):13-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931//1995-5464.2022-3-13-21