Preview

Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery

Advanced search

Potential of intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral cholangioscopy in the treatment of ”complex” choledocholithiasis

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-30-38

Abstract

   Aim. To evaluate the efficacy of various methods of intraductal contact lithotripsy in “complex” choledocholithiasis.

   Materials and methods. From January 2018 to July 2023, 40 patients underwent intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral transpapillary cholangioscopy. Indications for the procedure included failure of mechanical lithotripsy in large choledocholithiasis in 37 patients (92.5 %), impaction of the gallstone during conventional lithoextraction, narrow pancreatic part of common bile duct, intrahepatic localization of gallstones. Contact electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed in 10 patients (25 %), laser fragmentation by holmium laser in 15 patients (37.5 %), and new thulium
laser – in 15 patients (37.5 %).

   Results. The overall efficacy of contact lithotripsy methods comprised 90%. Laser methods demonstrated comparable results: the overall success rate of lithotripsy with holmium laser accounted for 93.3 %, and with thulium laser – 90 %. Complete sanitation after the first intervention with holmium lithotripsy was achieved in 92.9 % of patients, with thulium laser – in 88.9 %. The efficacy of electrohydraulic lithotripsy was lower: the overall success rate comprised
86.7 %, and the success rate after the first procedure accounted for 61.5 % of patients. The average number of interventions required to achieve complete sanitation of the bile ducts amounted to 1.07 for holmium laser lithotripsy,
1.1 for thulium laser, and 1.6 for electrohydraulic lithotripsy. In 1 case (2.5 %), perforation of the wall of the common bile duct was noted during the extraction of stone fragments. The complication was corrected during retrograde intervention. No fatal outcomes reported.

   Conclusion. Intraductal contact lithotripsy proved to be highly effective and safe. Laser methods demonstrate certain advantages over electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

About the Authors

S. A. Budzinsky
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Stanislav A. Budzinskiy, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Department, Chief Researcher

Endoscopy Department; Research Institute of Clinical Surgery; Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy 

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; 119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



M. A. Anishchenko
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Maria A. Anishchenko, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Endoscopist, Senior
Researcher

Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; 119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



S. G. Shapovalyants
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Shapovalyants, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Laboratory, Head of the Department

Research Institute of Clinical Surgery; Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy; Faculty of General Medicine; Department of Hospital Surgery No. 2

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; 119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



E. A. Vorobyova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Elizaveta A. Vorobyeva, Endoscopist, Research Associate

Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; 119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



E. N. Platonova
Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Elena N. Platonova, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Care

119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



E. D. Fedorov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation; Akad. G.M. Savelyeva City Clinical Hospital No. 31
Russian Federation

Evgeniy D. Fedorov, Doct of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Endoscopist, Chief
Researcher

Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; 119415; 42, Lobachevskoro str.; Moscow



A. S. Melnikova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Anna S. Melnikova, Resident

117997; 1, Ostrivityanova str.; Moscow



References

1. Williams E., Beckingham I., El Sayed G., Gurusamy K., Sturgess R., Webster G., Young T. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut. 2017; 66 (5): 765–782. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312317

2. Li G., Pang Q., Zhai H., Zhang X., Dong Y., Li J., Jia X. SpyGlass-guided laser lithotripsy versus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for large common bile duct stones: a non-inferiority trial. Surg. Endosc. 2021; 35 (7): 3723–3731. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07862-4

3. Burhenne H.J. Electrohydrolytic fragmentation of retained common duct stones. Radiology. 1975; 117 (3): 721–723. doi: 10.1148/117.3.721

4. Fan S.T., Choi T.K., Wong J. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy for biliary stones. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1989; 59 (3): 217–221. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01504.x

5. Binmoeller K.F., Brückner M., Thonke F., Soehendra N. Treatment of difficult bile duct stones using mechanical, electrohydraulic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 1993; 25 (3): 201–206. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010293

6. Tringali A., Costa D., Fugazza A., Colombo M., Khalaf K., Repici A., Anderloni A. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: where are we now? A comprehensive review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2021; 27 (44): 7597–7611. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7597

7. Lux G., Ell C., Hochberger J., Müller D., Demling L. The first successful endoscopic retrograde laser lithotripsy of common bile duct stones in man using a pulsed neodymium-YAG laser. Endoscopy. 1986; 18 (4): 144–145. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1018356

8. Hochberger J., Bayer J., May A., Mühldorfer S., Maiss J., Hahn E.G., Ell C. Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones: results in 60 patients using a rhodamine 6G dye laser with optical stone tissue detection system. Gut. 1998; 43 (6): 823–829. doi: 10.1136/gut.43.6.823

9. Neuhaus H., Hoffmann W., Classen M. Laser lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary stones via 3.4 mm and 3.7 mm miniscopes: first clinical results. Endoscopy. 1992; 24 (3): 208–214. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010464

10. Das A.K., Chiura A., Conlin M.J., Eschelman D., Bagley D.H. Treatment of biliary calculi using holmium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1998; 48 (2): 207–209. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70167-1

11. Chen Y.K. Preclinical characterization of the Spyglass peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for direct access, visualization, and biopsy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2007; 65 (2): 303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.048

12. Maydeo A., Kwek B.E., Bhandari S., Bapat M., Dhir V. Single-operator cholangioscopy-guided laser lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic ductal stones (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 2011; 74 (6): 1308–1314. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.08.047

13. Bang J.Y., Sutton B., Navaneethan U., Hawes R., Varadarajulu S. Efficacy of single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy compared with large balloon sphincteroplasty in management of difficult bile duct stones in a randomized trial. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020; 18 (10): 2349–2356. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.003

14. Ulvik Ø., Æsøy M.S., Juliebø-Jones P., Gjengstø P., Beisland C. Thulium fibre laser versus holmium:yag for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur. Urol. 2022; 82 (1): 73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.027

15. Mutignani M., Dioscoridi L., Italia A., Forti E., Pugliese F., Cintolo M., Bonato G., Giannetti A., Massad M. Thulium laser to manage a difficult biliary lithiasis: a first case report. Endoscopy. 2020; 52 (3): E112–E113. doi: 10.1055/a-0983-8278

16. Budzinskiy S.A., Shapovalyants S.G., Fedorov E.D., Vorobyeva E.A., Svirin M.Yu., Malyarov M.G., Chernyakevich P.L., Platonova E.N. First use of superpulsed fibre thulium laser-based contact stone ablation in common bile and main pancreatic ducts. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2021; 31 (2): 54–64. doi: 10.22416/1382-4376-2021-31-2-54-64 (In Russian)

17. Manzoor Ul Haque M., Hassan Luck N., Ali Tasneem A., Mudassir Laeeq S., Mandhwani R., Hanif F.M., Ullah Lail G. Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for difficult-to-retrieve common bile duct stones: a ten-year experience. J. Transl. Int. Med. 2020; 8 (3): 159–164. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2020-0025

18. Akerman S., Rahman M., Bernstein D.E. Direct cholangioscopy: the North Shore experience. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012; 24 (12): 1406–1409. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328357eb1b

19. Alameel T., Bain V., Sandha G. Clinical application of a single-operator direct visualization system improves the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 2013; 27 (1): 15–19. doi: 10.1155/2013/278758

20. Prachayakul V., Aswakul P., Kachintorn U. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy as an highly effective method for complete large common bile duct stone clearance. J. Interv. Gastroenterol. 2013; 3 (2): 59–63. doi: 10.7178/jig.108

21. Aljebreen A.M., Alharbi O.R., Azzam N., Almadi M.A. Efficacy of spyglass-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy in difficult bile duct stones. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2014; 20 (6): 366–370. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.145329

22. Moura E.G., Franzini T., Moura R.N., Carneiro F.O., Artifon E.L., Sakai P. Cholangioscopy in bile duct disease: a case series. Arq. Gastroenterol. 2014; 51 (3): 250–254. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000300015

23. Veld J.V., van Huijgevoort N.C.M., Boermeester M.A., Besselink M.G., van Delden O.M., Fockens P., van Hooft J.E. A systematic review of advanced endoscopy-assisted lithotripsy for retained biliary tract stones: laser, electrohydraulic or extracorporeal shock wave. Endoscopy. 2018; 50 (9): 896–909. doi: 10.1055/a-0637-8806

24. Sauer B.G., Cerefice M., Swartz D.C., Gaidhane M., Jain A., Haider S., Kahaleh M. Safety and efficacy of laser lithotripsy for complicated biliary stones using direct choledochoscopy. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013; 58 (1): 253–256. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2359-1

25. Canena J., Lopes L., Fernandes J., Alexandrino G., Lourenço L., Libânio D., Horta D., Giestas S., Reis J. Outcomes of single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy in patients with difficult biliary and pancreatic stones. GE Port. J. Gastroenterol. 2019; 26 (2): 105–113. doi: 10.1159/000488508

26. Alexandrino G., Lopes L., Fernandes J., Moreira M., Araújo T., Campos S., Loureiro R., Figueiredo L., Lourenço L.C., Horta D., Bana E Costa T., Costa P., Canena J. Factors influencing performance of cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy including available different technologies: a prospective multicenter study with 94 patients. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2022; 67 (8): 4195–4203. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07305-7

27. Amaral A.C., Hussain W.K., Han S. Cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy for the treatment of choledocholithiasis : a systematic review. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2023; 1–8. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2214657


Supplementary files

Review

For citations:


Budzinsky S.A., Anishchenko M.A., Shapovalyants S.G., Vorobyova E.A., Platonova E.N., Fedorov E.D., Melnikova A.S. Potential of intraductal contact lithotripsy with oral cholangioscopy in the treatment of ”complex” choledocholithiasis. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2024;29(1):30-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2024-1-30-38

Views: 660


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)