Prevention of infectious complications of pancreatoduodenal resections by revising the approach to perioperative use of antibacterial drugs
https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2026-1-44-52
Abstract
Aim. To reduce the incidence of postoperative infectious complications after pancreatoduodenal resection using targeted perioperative antibiotic therapy.
Materials and methods. The retrospective study included patients who had undergone pancreatoduodenal resection between 2019 and May 2023. The inclusion criterion was bacteriological examination of bile obtained both before and during surgery. Of the 249 patients who had undergone surgery, 108 were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups: those with antibiotic-sensitive flora and those with resistant flora. Infectious complications were determined according to the criteria of the Russian National Association of Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Professionals. The probability of developing an infection and the need for repeat surgery or hospital readmission was assessed.
Results. The probability of developing infectious complications in the group of patients with resistant flora was 57.5%, compared to 15% in the group with sensitive flora (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis found that baseline antibiotic resistance of bile bacterial flora and body mass index are independent predictors of the risk of infectious complications after pancreatoduodenal resection: HR = 5.17 (95% CI 2.15–12.5, p < 0.001) and 1.10 (95% CI 1.03–1.18, p = 0.007).
Conclusion. Targeted perioperative use of antibiotics, taking the sensitivity of the bacterial flora of bile into account, contributes to a reduction in the frequency of infectious complications of pancreatoduodenal resection.
About the Authors
I. E. KhatkovRussian Federation
Igor E. Khatkov — Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov; Head of the Department of Faculty Surgery No. 2, The RUM.
86, Sh. Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
M. G. Efanov
Russian Federation
Mikhail G. Efanov — Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of the Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Department.
86, Sh. Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
V. V. Tsvirkun
Russian Federation
Victor V. Tsvirkun — Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Chief Researcher.
86, Sh. Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
M. Y. Drokov
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Drokov — Head of the Research Sector for Chemotherapy of Hemoblastoses, Hematopoietic Depressions and Bone Marrow Transplantation.
4, Novy Zykovsky travel, Moscow, 125167
O. Y. Gasieva
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Gasieva — Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology.
86, Sh. Entuziastov, Moscow, 111123
References
1. Kozlov I.A., Baydarova M.D., Shevchenko T.V., Ikramov R.Z., Zharikov Yu.O. Duodenum-preserving total pancreatic head resection. Early postoperative outcomes. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery. 2020; 25 (4): 107–117 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.20204107-117
2. Patyutko Yu.I., Kotelnikov A.G., Polyakov A.N., Podluzhnyi D.V. Evolution of surgery for pancreatic head and periampullary cancer. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery. 2019; 24 (3): 45–53 (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2019345-53
3. Propp A.R., Degovtsov E.N. Comparative Analysis of the Results of Various Methods for Pancreatic Head Resection in Chronic Pancreatitis. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal “Emergency Medical Care”. 2020; 9 (2): 238–250. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2020-9-2-238-250
4. Beane J.D., Borrebach J.D., Zureikat A.H., Kilbane E.M., Thompson V.M., Pitt H.A. Optimal pancreatic surgery: are we making progress in North America? Ann. Surg. 2021; 274 (4): e355–e363. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003628
5. Cameron J.L., Riall T.S., Coleman J., Belcher K.A. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244 (1): 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000217673.04165.ea
6. Kimura W., Miyata H., Gotoh M., Hirai I., Kenjo A., Kitagawa Y., Shimada M., Baba H., Tomita N., Nakagoe T., Sugihara K., Mori M. A pancreaticoduodenectomy risk model derived from 8575 cases from a national single-race population (Japanese) using a web-based data entry system: the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 2014; 259 (4): 773–780. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000263
7. Amini N., Spolverato G., Kim Yu., Pawlik T.M. Trends in hospital volume and failure to rescue for pancreatic surgery. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2015; 19 (9): 1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-015-2800-(2)
8. Schoeniger L.O., Linehan D.C. Wound infections after pancreaticoduodenectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151 (5): 440. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4659
9. Parikh J.A., Beane J.D., Kilbane E.M., Milgrom D.P., Pitt H.A. Is American College of Surgeons NSQIP organ space infection a surrogate for pancreatic fistula? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2014; 219 (6): 1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.08.006
10. Sandini M., Ruscic K. J., Ferrone C. R., Qadan M., Eikermann M., Warshaw A. L., Lillemoe K. D., Castillo C. F. Major complications independently increase long-term mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2019; 23 (10): 1984–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3939-y
11. ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 1999; 56 (18): 1839–1888. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/56.18.1839
12. Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M., Perl T.M., Auwaerter P.G, Bolon M.K., Fish D.N., Napolitano L.M., Sawyer R.G., Slain D., Steinberg J.P., Weinstein R.A.; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Infectious Disease Society of America; Surgical Infection Society; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2013; 70 (3): 195–283. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120568
13. Fathi A.H., Jackson T., Barati M., Eghbalieh B., Siegel K.A., Siegel C.T. Extended Perioperative Antibiotic Coverage in Conjunction with Intraoperative Bile Cultures Decreases Infectious Complications after Pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB Surg. 2016; 2016: 3031749. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3031749
14. Mintziras I., Maurer E., Kanngiesser V., Lohoff M., Bartsch D.K. Preoperative Bacterobilia Is an Independent Risk Factor of SSIs after Partial PD. Dig. Surg. 2020; 37 (5): 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1159/000508127
15. Shabunin AV, Lebedev SS, Tavobilov MM, Bagatelia ZA, Grekov DN, Karpov AA, Afanasieva VA. Preoperative biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: to drain or not to drain? And if drain, in what way? Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2021; 6: 101–105 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia2021051101
16. Zagainov V.E., Ruina O.V., Zarechnova N.V., Kuchin D.M., Kiselev N.M., Naraliev N.U., Mukhanzaev Sh.Kh. Infectious complications after elective surgeries on the liver and pancreas. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2023; 28 (4): 71–80 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2023-4-71-80
17. Cengiz T.B., Jarrar A., Power C., Joyce D., Anzlovar N., Morris-Stiff G. Antimicrobial Stewardship Reduces Surgical Site Infection Rate, as well as Number and Severity of Pancreatic Fistulae after Pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. Infect (Larchmt). 2020; 21 (3): 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2019.108
18. Klinicheskie rekomendacii po profilaktike infekcii oblasti hirurgicheskogo vmeshatel’stva «Nacional’naya associaciya specialistov po kontrolyu infekcij, svyazannyh s okazaniem medicinskoj pomoshchi» [Clinical Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections. “National Association of Healthcare Infection Control Specialists (NAHICS)”]. 2018, P. 8–24, 29–49.
19. Charlson M., Szatrowski T.P., Peterson J., Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1994; 47 (11): 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5
20. Griffin J.F., Poruk K.E., Wolfgang C.L. Pancreatic cancer surgery: past, present, and future. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 2015; 27 (4): 332–348. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.07
21. Lillemoe K.D., Rikkers L.F. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: the golden era. Ann. Surg. 2006; 244 (1): 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000226042.37420.f9
22. Sohn T.A., Yeo C.J., Cameron J.L., Koniaris L., Kaushal S., Abrams R.A., Sauter P.K., Coleman J., Hruban R.H., Lillemoe K.D. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2000; 4 (6): 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80105-5
23. D’Angelica M.I., Ellis R.J., Liu J. B., Brajcich B.C., Gönen M., Thompson V.M., Cohen M.E., Seo S.K., Zabor E.C., Babicky M.L., Bentrem D.J., Behrman S.W., Bertens K.A., Celinski S.A., Chan C.H.F., Dillhoff M., Dixon M.E.B., Fernandez-Del Castillo C., Gholami S., House M.G., Karanicolas P.J., Lavu H., Maithel S.K., McAuliffe J.C., Ott M.J., Reames B.N., Sanford D.E., Sarpel U., Scaife C.L., Serrano P.E., Smith T., Snyder R.A., Talamonti M.S., Weber S.M, Yopp A.C., Pitt H.A., Ko C.Y. Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023; 329 (18): 1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.5728
24. Jencks S.F., Williams M.V., Coleman E.A. Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009; 360 (14): 1418–1428. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0803563. Erratum in: N. Engl. J. Med. 2011; 364 (16): 1582.
25. McIlvennan C.K., Eapen Z.J., Allen L.A. Hospital readmissions reduction program. Circulation. 2015; 131 (20): 1796–1803. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010270
Review
For citations:
Khatkov I.E., Efanov M.G., Tsvirkun V.V., Drokov M.Y., Gasieva O.Y. Prevention of infectious complications of pancreatoduodenal resections by revising the approach to perioperative use of antibacterial drugs. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2026;31(1):44-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2026-1-44-52
JATS XML
























