Preview

Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery

Advanced search

A PREDICTIVE OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF INTERVAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY BASED ON GALL BLADDER INFLAMMATION STATUS DURING IMMEDIATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2016159-77

Abstract

Objective. For unsafe (seriously ill or debilitated)  and severe cholecystitis patients,  percutaneous cholecystostomy  with scheduled  interval cholecystectomy  (IC)  has been advocated;  however, because of lacking an inflammation grading system none of the published data comparing changes of inflammation status is available.

Background. Using a self-designed gallbladder (GB) inflammation grading system, the author tried to predict outcomes of IC and reappraise whether delayed IC is justified.

Methods. The intraoperative  inflammation of 260 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy  (LC) patients with symptomatic  GB stone diseases was graded (I–VI). Based on grading criteria, predicted outcomes were categorized as “improve”, “unpredictable”, “no change”,  and “worsen”.

Results. Predictive results of these four categories for Grades I–III  (inflammation limited to GB) were 23.7, 2.5, 73.0, and  1.4%;  14.3,  57.1,  14.3,  and  14.3%;  7.7,  53.8,  7.7,  and  30.8% respectively.  For  Grade  IV (mild  to  moderate inflammation of Calot’s triangle) they were 11.5, 9.6, 30.8, and 50.0%. For Grades V (severe inflammation of Calot’s triangle) and VI (severe inflammation involving the hepatoduodenal ligament) they were 0, 0, 0, and 100%. All 3 common bile duct injuries were in the “worsen” category.

Conclusion. Our findings do not favor IC. For simple GB (Grades  I–IV), immediate  LC can be done safely and IC is unnecessary.  For  difficult  GB  (Grade   V–VI),   IC  brings  no  improvement.  Interval  waiting  to  downgrade  the inflammation seems impractical,  especially for difficult  GB.  Our  inflammation grading  system can  provide  actual inflammation data during cholecystostomy and IC for judging the justification of the delayed IC policy.

About the Author

Yu-Chung Chang
National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University; Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University; Masuda Medical Association Hospital
Taiwan, Province of China

Yu-Chung Chang – MD, PhD. Department of Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan;  Department of Surgery MMAHю

1917-2, Toodacho, Masuda, Shimane 699-3676. Japan, Phone: +81-856-22-3611, ext. 263; Fax: +81-856-22-0407



References

1. Casillas R.A., Yegiyants S., Collins J.C. Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred management of acute cholecystitis. Arch. Surg. 2008; 143 (6): 533–537. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.6.533.

2. Lo C.M., Liu C.L., Fan S.T., Lai E.C., Wong J. Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann. Surg. 1998; 227 (4): 461–467.

3. Kolla S.B., Aggarwal S., Kumar A., Kumar R., Chumber S., Parshad R., Seenu V. Early vs. delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A prospective randomized trial. Surg. Endosc. 2004; 18 (9): 1323–1327.

4. Yüksel O., Salman B., Yilmaz U., Akyürek N., Tatlicioğlu E. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for subacute calculous cholecystitis: early or interval – a prospective study. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2006; 13 (5): 421–426.

5. Lau H., Lo C.Y., Patil N.G., Yuen W.K. Early versus delayedinterval laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: A meta-analysis. Surg. Endosc. 2006; 20 (1): 82–87.

6. Gurusamy K., Samraj K., Gluud C., Wilson E., Davidson B.R. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Br. J. Surg. 2010; 97 (2): 141–150. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6870.

7. Ishizaki Y., Miwa K., Yoshimoto J., Sugo H., Kawasaki S. Conversion of elective laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy between 1993 and 2004. Br. J. Surg. 2006; 93 (8): 987–991.

8. Strasberg S.M. Acute calculous cholecystitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008; 358: 2804–2811.

9. Litwin D.E.M., Cahan M.A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2008; 88 (6): 1295–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.07.005.

10. Elwood D.R. Cholecystitis. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2008; 88 (6): 1241–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2008.07.008.

11. Welschbillig-Meunier K., Pessaux P., Lebigot J., Lermite E., Aube Ch., Brehant O., Hamy A., Arnaud J.P. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis. Surg. Endosc. 2005; 19 (9): 1256–1259.

12. Yamashita Y., Takeda T., Kawarada Y., Nimura Y., Hirota M., Miura F., Mayumi T., Yoshida M., Strasberg S., Pitt H.A., de Santibanes E., Belghiti J., Büchler M.W., Gouma D.J., Fan S.T., Hilvano S.C., Lau J.W., Kim S.W., Belli G., Windsor J.A., Liau K.H., Sachakul V. Surgical treatment of patients with acute cholecystitis: Tokyo guidelines. J. Hepatobil. Pancreat. Surg. 2007; 14 (1): 91–97.

13. Chang Y.C. A proposed inflammation grading system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005; 52 (61): 33–36.

14. Martin I.G., Dexter S.P.L., Marton J., Gibson J., Asker J., Firullo A., McMahon M.J. Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc. 1995; 9 (2): 203–206.

15. Fabiani P., Iovine L., Katkhouda J., Gugenheim J., Mouiel J. Dissection du triangle de Calot par voie coelioscopique. Presse Med. 1993; 22 (11): 535–537.

16. Nagai H., Kondo Y., Yasuda T., Kasahara K., Kanazawa K. An abdominal wall-lifting method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without peritoneal insufflation. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. 1993; 3 (3): 175–179.

17. Rattner D.W., Ferguson C., Warshaw A.L. Factors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann. Surg. 1993; 217 (3): 233–236.

18. Sternberg S.S. Sternberg's Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 2nd Ed., Vol. 2. Sternberg S.S., Mills S.E., Carter D. (eds). New York: Raven Press, 1994. P. 1587.

19. Schrenk P., Woisetschlager R., Wayland Wu. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cause of conversion in 1,300 patients and analysis of risk factors. Surg. Endosc. 1995; 9 (1): 25–28.

20. Estes N., McElhinney C., Estes M.A., Opie H., Johnson M. Acute cholecystitis treated urgently by nonselective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. Surg. 1996; 62 (7): 598–602.

21. Misawa T., Saito R., Shiba H., Son K., Futagawa Y., Nojiri T., Kitajima K., Uwagawa T., Ishida Y., Ishii Y., Yanaga K. Analysis of bile duct injuries (Stewart-Way classification) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2006; 13 (5): 427–434.

22. Way L.W., Stewart L., Gantert W., Liu K., Lee C.M., Whang K., Hunter J.G. Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann. Surg. 2003; 237 (4): 460–469.

23. Strasberg S.M., Eagon C.J., Drebin J.A. The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy – the danger of the false infundibulum. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2000; 191 (6): 661–667.

24. Bauman J.A. Wound healing. In: Schwartz’ s Principles of Surgery, 9th Edition, Chapter 9. Brunicardi F., Andersen D., Billiar T., Dunn D., Hunter J., Matthews J., Pollock R.E. (eds.) New York: McGraw Hill Professional, 2009. P. 212–213.


Review

For citations:


Chang Yu. A PREDICTIVE OUTCOME ANALYSIS OF INTERVAL CHOLECYSTECTOMY BASED ON GALL BLADDER INFLAMMATION STATUS DURING IMMEDIATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2016;21(1):59-77. https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2016159-77

Views: 612


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1995-5464 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9524 (Online)