CYSTIC DISEASE OF BILE DUCTS: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS AT THE STAGES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT
https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2017294-103
Abstract
Aim. To evaluate the role of radiological methods in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of cystic transformation of bile ducts and monitoring of operated patients.
Material and Methods. The study included 38 patients with cystic transformation of bile duct aged 25–75 years (mean 41.1 ± 13.5 years). There were 6 (16%) men and 32 (84%) women. Preoperative survey included ultrasound, CT, MRI, ERCP. All patients were operated.
Results. All patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 17 (44.7%) patients with primary disease, group 2 – 21 (55.3%) patients with previous surgery for biliary cysts. Cystic transformation was not eradicated almost in all cases that resulted symptoms in remote period. Computed tomography was excluded from the diagnostic algorithm in view of these data. Therefore, cost and time of examination were reduced. The most effective diagnostic protocol for cystic transformation of bile duct includes ultrasound, contrast-enhanced MRI. These methods cover all necessary diagnostic spectrum and define the diagnosis in almost 98–100% of cases.
Conclusion. An assessment of cystic transformation of bile ducts should include following parameters: cyst type by T. Todani classification, state of its wall and content, relationship with surrounding organs and their structural changes. These parameters are important to choose the right surgical approach. These data should be obtained at preoperative stage. It is essential to begin a survey from non-invasive methods. High risk of long-term postoperative complications and malignant transformation indicates the need for dynamic monitoring of patient after surgery.
About the Authors
Yu. A. StepanovaRussian Federation
Stepanova Yulia Aleksandrovna – Doct. of Med. Sci., Senior Researcher of Radiological Methods of Diagnostics and Treatment Department
For correspondence*: Stepanova Yulia Aleksandrovna – 27, B. Serpukhovskaya str., Moscow, 117997. A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery, Russian Federation. Phone: +7-499-236-44-14. E-mail: stepanovaua@mail.ru
A. A. Koroleva
Russian Federation
Koroleva Anna Aleksandrovna – Postgraduate Student of the Abdominal Surgery Department №1
D. A. Ionkin
Russian Federation
Ionkin Dmitry Anatolyevich – Cand. of Med. Sci., Senior Researcher of the Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery
A. B. Shurakova
Russian Federation
Shurakova Anna Borisovna – Cand. of Med. Sci., Researcher of the Department of Liver and Pancreatic Surgery
E. N. Solodinina
Russian Federation
Solodinina Elena Nikolaevna – Doct. of Med. Sci., Senior Researcher of the Surgical Endoscopy Department
V. A. Vishnevsky
Russian Federation
Vishnevsky Vladimir Aleksandrovich – Doct. of Med. Sci., Professor, Chief of the Abdominal Surgery Department №2
References
1. Milonov O.B., Gureeva Kh.F. Congenital cysts of a biliary tract (literature review). Khirurgia. 1982; 1: 108–114. (In Russian)
2. Alonsoi-Lej F., Rever W.B. Jr., Pessango D.J. Congenital choledochal cysts, with a report of 2, and analysis of 94 cases. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1959; 108 (1): 1–30. 3. Vachel Н.R., Stevens W.M. Case of intrahepatic calculi. Br. Med. J. 1906; 218–222.
3. Tsvirkun V.V., Vishnevsky V.A., Gavrilin A.V., Karmazanovsky G.G., Ionkin D.A. Surgical interventions at cysts of biliary channels. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii. 1998; 3 (1): 73–79. (In Russian)
4. Yamaguchi M. Congenital choledochal cyst analysis of 1.433 patients in the Japanese literature. Am. J. Surg. 1980; 140 (5): 654–657.
5. Rukovodstvo po khirurgii zhelchnyh putej [Guide to surgery of a biliary tract]. Eds. E.I. Galperin, P.S. Vetshev. Moscow: Vidar-M, 2006. P. 230–236. (In Russian)
6. Shalimov A.A., Shalimov S.A., Nichitaylo M.E., Domansky B.V. Khirurgija pecheni i zhelchevyvodjashhih putej [Surgery of a liver and biliary tract]. Kiiv: Health, 1993. P. 203–236. (In Russian)
7. Bhavsar M.S., Vora H.B., Giriyappa V.H. Choledochal cyst: a review of literature. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 18 (4): 230–236.
8. Soares K.C., Arnaoutakis D.J., Kamel I., Rastegar N., Anders R., Maithel S., Pawlik T.M. Choledochal cysts: presen tation, clinical differentiation, and management. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2014; 219 (6): 1167–1180. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.023.
9. Todani T., Watanabe Y., Toki A., Morotomi Y. Classification of congenital biliary cystic disease: special reference to type Ic and IVA cysts with primary ductal stricture. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 2003; 10 (5): 340–344.
10. Stepanova Yu.A. Luchevye metody diagnostiki kistoznyh obrazovanij podzheludochnoj zhelezy i parapankreaticheskoj zony na jetapah khirurgicheskogo lechenija [Radiology methods of diagnostics of pancreas and parapancreatic zone cystic formations at the stages of surgical treatment: dis. … doct. of med. sci.]. Moscow, 2009. 398 p. (In Russian)
11. Liu Y.B., Wang J.W., Devkota K.R., Ji Z.L., Li J.T., Wang X.A., Ma X.M., Cai W.L., Kong Y., Cao L.P., Peng S.Y. Congenital choledochal cysts in adults: twenty-five-year experience. Chin. Med. J. (Engl.). 2007; 120 (16): 1404–1407.
12. Tumanyan G.T. Diagnostika i khirurgicheskoe lechenie anomalij razvitija zhelchnogo puzyrja i zhelchevyvodjashhih protokov u detej [Diagnostics and surgical treatment of anomalies of development of a gall bladder and biliary channels at children: avtoref. dis. … doct. of med. sci.]. Moscow, 2008. 48 p. (In Russian)
13. Moslim M.A., Takahashi H., Seifarth F.G., Walsh R.M., MorrisStiff G. Choledochal cyst disease in a western center: A 30-year experience. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2016; 20 (8): 1453–1463. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3181-4.
14. Silva-Baez H., Coello-Ramirez P., Ixtabalan-Escalante E.M., Sotelo-Anaya E., Gallo-Morales M., Cordero-Estrada E., Sainz-Escarrega V.H., Ploneda-Valencia C.F. Treatment of choledochal cyst in a pediatric population. A single institution experience of 15-years. Case series. Ann. Med. Surg. (Lond.). 2016; 5: 81–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2015.12.054.
15. Gall B.M., Madziga A.G., Hamid A.U. Choledochal cyst: a case report and review of literature. Niger J. Med. 2004; 13 (3): 295– 299.
16. Machado N.O., Chopra P.J., Al-Zadjali A., Younas S. Choledochal cyst in adults: etiopathogenesis, presentation, management, and outcome – case series and review. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2015; 2015: 602591. DOI: org/10.1155/2015/602591.
17. Diao M., Li L., Cheng W. Recurrence of biliary tract obstructions after primary laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy in children with choledochal cysts. Surg. Endosc. 2016; 30 (9): 3910–3915. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4697-5.
18. Degtyarev Yu.G. Diagnostika i lechenie kistoznoj transformacii gepatobiliarnoj sistemy u detej (kliniko-ehksperimental'noe issledovanie) [Diagnostics and treatment of cystic transformation of hepatobiliary system at children (a clinical experimental research): avtoref. diss. … cand. of med. sci.]. Minsk, 2001. 21 p.
19. Hopkins N.F.G., Benjamin N.I.S., Thompson M.H., Williamson R.C.N. Complications of choledochal cysts in adulthood. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1990; 72: 229–235.
Review
For citations:
Stepanova Yu.A., Koroleva A.A., Ionkin D.A., Shurakova A.B., Solodinina E.N., Vishnevsky V.A. CYSTIC DISEASE OF BILE DUCTS: DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS AT THE STAGES OF SURGICAL TREATMENT. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB Surgery. 2017;22(2):94-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.16931/1995-5464.2017294-103